Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • Should "and" be "and/or"? If so, I'll +1. Commented Feb 9, 2009 at 6:31
  • I'm not an expert in db theory but you sound right. I'll check and edit. Commented Feb 9, 2009 at 6:34
  • "Null values (distinct from an empty character string or a string of blank characters and distinct from zero or any other number) are supported in a fully relational DBMS for representing missing information and inapplicable information in a systematic way, independent of the data type" (cont..) Commented Feb 9, 2009 at 6:37
  • It may be applicable but missing, for example, I decline to tell you my wage. Or it may be inapplicable, for example, I'm a contractor so my annual wage column is NULL but my hourly rate column is not. Commented Feb 9, 2009 at 6:37
  • So from the context , you are right. (btw : this is from Codd's 12 rules : scs.carleton.ca/~bertossi/integra08/material/Codd12Rules.txt) Commented Feb 9, 2009 at 6:37