97

I've got a JavaScript object definition which contains a circular reference: it has a property that references the parent object.

It also has functions that I don't want to be passed through to the server. How would I serialize and deserialize these objects?

I've read that the best method to do this is to use Douglas Crockford's stringify. However, I'm getting the following error in Chrome:

TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON

The code:

function finger(xid, xparent){ this.id = xid; this.xparent; //other attributes } function arm(xid, xparent){ this.id = xid; this.parent = xparent; this.fingers = []; //other attributes this.moveArm = function() { //moveArm function details - not included in this testcase alert("moveArm Executed"); } } function person(xid, xparent, xname){ this.id = xid; this.parent = xparent; this.name = xname this.arms = [] this.createArms = function () { this.arms[this.arms.length] = new arm(this.id, this); } } function group(xid, xparent){ this.id = xid; this.parent = xparent; this.people = []; that = this; this.createPerson = function () { this.people[this.people.length] = new person(this.people.length, this, "someName"); //other commands } this.saveGroup = function () { alert(JSON.stringify(that.people)); } }

This is a test case that I created for this question. There are errors within this code but essentially I have objects within objects, and a reference passed to each object to show what the parent object is when the object is created. Each object also contains functions, which I don't want stringified. I just want the properties such as the Person.Name.

How do I serialize before sending to the server and deserialize it assuming that the same JSON is passed back?

Improve this question
2

7 Answers 7

Reset to default
139

Circular structure error occurs when you have a property of the object which is the object itself directly (a -> a) or indirectly (a -> b -> a).

To avoid the error message, tell JSON.stringify what to do when it encounters a circular reference. For example, if you have a person pointing to another person ("parent"), which may (or may not) point to the original person, do the following:

JSON.stringify( that.person, function( key, value) { if( key == 'parent') { return value.id;} else {return value;} })

The second parameter to stringify is a filter function. Here it simply converts the referred object to its ID, but you are free to do whatever you like to break the circular reference.

You can test the above code with the following:

function Person( params) { this.id = params['id']; this.name = params['name']; this.father = null; this.fingers = []; // etc. } var me = new Person({ id: 1, name: 'Luke'}); var him = new Person( { id:2, name: 'Darth Vader'}); me.father = him; JSON.stringify(me); // so far so good him.father = me; // time travel assumed :-) JSON.stringify(me); // "TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON" // But this should do the job: JSON.stringify(me, function( key, value) { if(key == 'father') { return value.id; } else { return value; }; });

BTW, I'd choose a different attribute name to "parent" since it is a reserved word in many languages (and in DOM). This tends to cause confusion down the road...

Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

What should we change the variable parent with?
@Esqarrouth owner is usually used instead of parent.
CIrculating parent key is not available in the replacer function.
22

No-lib

Use below replacer to generate json with string references (similar to json-path) to duplicate/circular referenced objects

let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer()); 

function refReplacer() { let m = new Map(), v= new Map(), init = null; // in TypeScript add "this: any" param to avoid compliation errors - as follows // return function (this: any, field: any, value: any) { return function(field, value) { let p= m.get(this) + (Array.isArray(this) ? `[${field}]` : '.' + field); let isComplex= value===Object(value) if (isComplex) m.set(value, p); let pp = v.get(value)||''; let path = p.replace(/undefined\.\.?/,''); let val = pp ? `#REF:${pp[0]=='[' ? '$':'$.'}${pp}` : value; !init ? (init=value) : (val===init ? val="#REF:$" : 0); if(!pp && isComplex) v.set(value, path); return val; } } // --------------- // TEST // --------------- // gen obj with duplicate references let a = { a1: 1, a2: 2 }; let b = { b1: 3, b2: "4" }; let obj = { o1: { o2: a }, b, a }; // duplicate reference a.a3 = [1,2,b]; // circular reference b.b3 = a; // circular reference let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer(), 4); console.log(s);

And following parser function to regenerate object from such "ref-json"

function parseRefJSON(json) { let objToPath = new Map(); let pathToObj = new Map(); let o = JSON.parse(json); let traverse = (parent, field) => { let obj = parent; let path = '#REF:$'; if (field !== undefined) { obj = parent[field]; path = objToPath.get(parent) + (Array.isArray(parent) ? `[${field}]` : `${field?'.'+field:''}`); } objToPath.set(obj, path); pathToObj.set(path, obj); let ref = pathToObj.get(obj); if (ref) parent[field] = ref; for (let f in obj) if (obj === Object(obj)) traverse(obj, f); } traverse(o); return o; } // ------------ // TEST // ------------ let s = `{ "o1": { "o2": { "a1": 1, "a2": 2, "a3": [ 1, 2, { "b1": 3, "b2": "4", "b3": "#REF:$.o1.o2" } ] } }, "b": "#REF:$.o1.o2.a3[2]", "a": "#REF:$.o1.o2" }`; console.log('Open Chrome console to see nested fields:'); let obj = parseRefJSON(s); console.log(obj);

Improve this answer

1 Comment

it's awesome....
11

It appears that dojo can represent circular references in JSON in the form : {"id":"1","me":{"$ref":"1"}}

Here is an example:

http://jsfiddle.net/dumeG/

require(["dojox/json/ref"], function(){ var me = { name:"Kris", father:{name:"Bill"}, mother:{name:"Karen"} }; me.father.wife = me.mother; var jsonMe = dojox.json.ref.toJson(me); // serialize me alert(jsonMe); });​

Produces: 

{ "name":"Kris", "father":{ "name":"Bill", "wife":{ "name":"Karen" } }, "mother":{ "$ref":"#father.wife" } }

Note: You can also de-serialize these circular referenced objects using the dojox.json.ref.fromJson method.

Other Resources:

How to serialize DOM node to JSON even if there are circular references?

JSON.stringify can't represent circular references

Improve this answer

7 Comments

Hi, thanks for your answer. I should have stated that I'm using jquery as my is library. I didn't think it was relevant at the time.ill update my post.
@user1012500 - Dojo works fine alongside jQuery. I often include other libraries or frameworks to compensate for deficiencies in my primary framework. You may even be able to extract the toJson and fromJson methods and create your own jQuery wrapper around them. That way you won't need to pull in the whole framework. Unfortunately, jQuery does not have this functionality out of the box, and JSON.stringify can't handle these types of objects. So other than the above examples, you may have to code this functionality yourself.
Hi Brandon, I'm hesitant to add another library to solve the problem since it adds another footprint to the site. However, i gave dojo a shot and attempted to use your example against mine. However, i ran into the circular reference issue (I don't have much knowledge of dojo, so I've just attempted a couple of things but mainly based on your example): jsfiddle.net/Af3d6/1
JSON not to be confused with JavaScript object literals cannot contain functions since it is a data interchange format (like XML). So in order to serialize to the JSON format, you need a compliant object literal. This example modifies your example to be compliant (though it may not be what your looking for since you're no longer working with object instances). Even when you remove your toJSON functions, the references to the underlying prototype functions still makes it invalid.
Dojo's ref module managed to stringify / parse my models like a breeze. In my scenario the cycle.js library from crockford wasn't successful because I'm using newtonsoft json.net to serialize C# objects and it doesn't use jsonpath (as cycle.js uses). Looks like the good old dojo saved my day! Thanks for this answer.
|
5

I found two suitable modules to handle circular references in JSON.

  1. CircularJSON https://github.com/WebReflection/circular-json whose output can be used as input to .parse(). It also works in Browsers & Node.js Also see: http://webreflection.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/solving-cycles-recursions-and-circulars.html
  2. Isaacs json-stringify-safe https://github.com/isaacs/json-stringify-safe which maybe more readable but can't be used for .parse and is only available for Node.js

Either of these should meet your needs.

Improve this answer

Comments

5

Happened upon this thread because I needed to log complex objects to a page, since remote debugging wasn't possible in my particular situation. Found Douglas Crockford's (inceptor of JSON) own cycle.js, which annotates circular references as strings such that they can be reconnected after parsing. The de-cycled deep copy is safe to pass through JSON.stringify. Enjoy!

https://github.com/douglascrockford/JSON-js

cycle.js: This file contains two functions, JSON.decycle and JSON.retrocycle, which make it possible to encode cyclical structures and dags in JSON, and to then recover them. This is a capability that is not provided by ES5. JSONPath is used to represent the links.

Improve this answer

Comments

0

The TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON you see is because JSON.stringify cannot handle cyclic references. Two practical approaches:

1) Quick (built-in) fix

Use a replacer with JSON.stringify to break the cycles as other answers explain.

2) Use a library that understands cycles and richer JS types

If you need a drop-in serializer that preserves circular / repeated references and preserves richer JS types (Set, Map, Date, RegExp, BigInt, etc.), consider next-json (NJSON). It was created exactly to extend JSON while keeping a few key properties that are valuable during development and debugging:

  • Safe parser: no eval: NJSON.parse uses a dedicated parser and does not rely on eval, so it avoids the security issues that come with evaluating arbitrary strings.

  • eval-compatible output: the string produced by NJSON.stringify is valid JavaScript: you can paste it into a JS REPL or a .js file and get the same value back without needing the library. That keeps the "paste into a REPL" debugging workflow that makes JSON convenient.

  • Supports many JS types: NJSON handles circular and repeated references and also supports Set, Map, Date, RegExp, BigInt, TypedArrays, undefined, NaN, Infinity and more, so you don’t have to manually convert those before serializing.

Example usage

import { NJSON } from "next-json"; const a = {}; a.self = a; // circular const s = new Set([a]); const obj = { a, s }; const serialized = NJSON.stringify(obj); const parsed = NJSON.parse(serialized); // parsed preserves circular refs and types: console.log(parsed.a === parsed.a.self); // true console.log(parsed.s instanceof Set); // true console.log(serialized); // ((A)=>({"a":Object.assign(A,{"self":A}),"s":new Set([A])}))({}) // !!! To be used only for development / debugging // !!! Not to be used in production environment const evaluated = eval(serialized); // evaluated preserves circular refs and types: console.log(evaluated.a === evaluated.a.self); // true console.log(evaluated.s instanceof Set); // true

NJSON is therefore a practical option when you want:

  1. safe parsing (no eval),
  2. debug-friendly JS-compatible output,
  3. support for richer JS types without ad-hoc replacers.

Disclosure: I'm the author of next-json (mentioned here for transparency).

Improve this answer

Comments

-13

I used the following to eliminate the circular references:

JS.dropClasses = function(o) { for (var p in o) { if (o[p] instanceof jQuery || o[p] instanceof HTMLElement) { o[p] = null; } else if (typeof o[p] == 'object' ) JS.dropClasses(o[p]); } }; JSON.stringify(JS.dropClasses(e));
Improve this answer

2 Comments

This will remove instances of jQuery and HTMLElement, not circular references?
@ZachB i think in his setup these are circular for him... but the problem is that just because javascript is the language in use doesn't mean we have jquery or even HTML elements.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.