I set up a python code to run Selenium chromedriver.exe. At the end of the run I have browser.close() to close the instance. (browser = webdriver.Chrome()) I believe it should release chromedriver.exe from memory (I'm on Windows 7). However after each run there is one chromedriver.exe instance remain in the memory. I hope there is a way I can write something in python to kill the chromedriver.exe process. Obviously browser.close() doesn't do the work. Thanks.
- Bottom line...you have to kill the process somehow because the designers didn't build it in. All other ways might leave a process running and that is enough to warrant the kill.Stephen G– Stephen G2015-01-16 17:27:25 +00:00Commented Jan 16, 2015 at 17:27
28 Answers
per the Selenium API, you really should call browser.quit() as this method will close all windows and kills the process. You should still use browser.quit().
However: At my workplace, we've noticed a huge problem when trying to execute chromedriver tests in the Java platform, where the chromedriver.exe actually still exists even after using browser.quit(). To counter this, we created a batch file similar to this one below, that just forces closed the processes.
kill_chromedriver.bat
@echo off rem just kills stray local chromedriver.exe instances. rem useful if you are trying to clean your project, and your ide is complaining. taskkill /im chromedriver.exe /f Since chromedriver.exe is not a huge program and does not consume much memory, you shouldn't have to run this every time, but only when it presents a problem. For example when running Project->Clean in Eclipse.
9 Comments
quit method, this should not be an issue. Force-killing the processes should only be a last resort, and your answer should reflect that.X it still remains. that's the ONLY reason for this batch file. Obviously quit is the way to go, however in my example, if you debug and stop execution - it never reaches the quit.I hope there is a way I can write something to kill the chromedriver.exe process.. and yes, that is nice! Java doesn't do thatbrowser.close() will close only the current chrome window.
browser.quit() should close all of the open windows, then exit webdriver.
3 Comments
browser.quit() did close all open windows. But chromedriver.exe was not exited. And there was an error message ' InvalidURL: nonnumeric port: 'port''.browser = webdriver.Firefox(). Both browser.close() and browser.quit() would close all windows and release memory. However chromedriver wouldn't do the same.Theoretically, calling browser.Quit will close all browser tabs and kill the process.
However, in my case I was not able to do that - since I running multiple tests in parallel, I didn't wanted to one test to close windows to others. Therefore, when my tests finish running, there are still many "chromedriver.exe" processes left running.
In order to overcome that, I wrote a simple cleanup code (C#):
Process[] chromeDriverProcesses = Process.GetProcessesByName("chromedriver"); foreach(var chromeDriverProcess in chromeDriverProcesses) { chromeDriverProcess.Kill(); } 5 Comments
//Calling close and then quit will kill the driver running process. driver.close(); driver.quit(); 3 Comments
It's kinda strange but it works for me. I had the similar issue, after some digging I found that there was still a UI action going on in the browser (URL loading or so), when I hit WebDriver.Quit().
The solution for me (altough very nasty) was to add a Sleep() of 3 seconds before calling Quit().
4 Comments
WebDriver.Quit() as well before, but sometimes it was leaving one chrome.exe process alive. Also I guess it is happening not on all operating systems.Kill Multiple Processes From the Command Line The first thing you’ll need to do is open up a command prompt, and then use the taskkill command with the following syntax:
taskkill /F /IM <processname.exe> /T These parameters will forcibly kill any process matching the name of the executable that you specify. For instance, to kill all iexplore.exe processes, we’d use:
taskkill /F /IM iexplore.exe Comments
This answer is how to properly dispose of the driver in C#
If you want to use a 'proper' mechanism that should be used to 'tidy up' after running ChromeDriver you should use IWebDriver.Dispose();
Performs application-defined tasks associated with freeing, releasing, or resetting unmanaged resources. (Inherited from IDisposable.)
I usually implement IDisposable on class that is dealing with IWebDriver
public class WebDriverController : IDisposable { public IWebDriver Driver; public void Dispose() { this.Driver.Dispose(); } } and use it like:
using (var controller = new WebDriverController()) { //code goes here } Hope this saves you some time
2 Comments
using (var driver = new ChromeDriver()) { //my code here } Sometimes, not always, "something" (don't know what??) happens and chromedriver.exe is still unreleased according to my taskmanager.Code c#
using System.Diagnostics; using System.Management; public void KillProcessAndChildren(string p_name) { ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher ("Select * From Win32_Process Where Name = '"+ p_name +"'"); ManagementObjectCollection moc = searcher.Get(); foreach (ManagementObject mo in moc) { try { KillProcessAndChildren(Convert.ToInt32(mo["ProcessID"])); } catch (ArgumentException) { break; } } } and this function
public void KillProcessAndChildren(int pid) { ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher ("Select * From Win32_Process Where ParentProcessID=" + pid); ManagementObjectCollection moc = searcher.Get(); foreach (ManagementObject mo in moc) { try { KillProcessAndChildren(Convert.ToInt32(mo["ProcessID"])); } catch { break; } } try { Process proc = Process.GetProcessById(pid); proc.Kill(); } catch (ArgumentException) { // Process already exited. } } Calling
try { KillProcessAndChildren("chromedriver.exe"); } catch { } 1 Comment
I had the same issue when running it in Python and I had to manually run 'killall' command to kill all processes. However when I implemented the driver using the Python context management protocol all processes were gone. It seems that Python interpreter does a really good job of cleaning things up.
Here is the implementation:
from selenium import webdriver from selenium.webdriver import ChromeOptions class Browser: def __enter__(self): self.options = webdriver.ChromeOptions() self.options.add_argument('--headless=new') self.options.add_argument('--no-sandbox') self.driver = webdriver.Chrome(options=self.options) return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.driver.close() self.driver.quit() And the usage:
with Browser() as browser: browser.driver.get("http://www.example.com") html = browser.driver.page_source print(html) Comments
So, you can use the following:
driver.close() Close the browser (emulates hitting the close button)
driver.quit() Quit the browser (emulates selecting the quit option)
driver.dispose() Exit the browser (tries to close every tab, then quit)
However, if you are STILL running into issues with hanging instances (as I was), you might want to also kill the instance. In order to do that, you need the PID of the chrome instance.
import os import signal driver = webdriver.Chrome() driver.get(('http://stackoverflow.com')) def get_pid(passdriver): chromepid = int(driver.service.process.pid) return (chromepid) def kill_chrome(thepid) try: os.kill(pid, signal.SIGTERM) return 1 except: return 0 print ("Loaded thing, now I'mah kill it!") try: driver.close() driver.quit() driver.dispose() except: pass kill_chrome(get_pid(driver)) If there's a chrome instance leftover after that, I'll eat my hat. :(
1 Comment
HOOK-ERROR in after_scenario: ProcessLookupError: [Errno 3] No such processI know this is somewhat of an old question, but I thought I'd share what worked for me. I was having problems with Eclipse -- it wouldn't kill the processes, and so I had a bunch of phantom processes hanging around after testing the code using the Eclipse runner.
My solution was to run Eclipse as administrator. That fixed it for me. Seems that Windows wasn't permitting Eclipse to close the process it spawned.
1 Comment
chromedriver.exe stays visible among Task Manager processes no matter I start Eclipse as administrator or normal user. It's possible that in my case this is the problem, because chromedriver.exe is 32 bit and my JRE is 64 bit. Eclipse Neon.1a (4.6.1), Windows 8.1 Pro 64 bit, Java 1.8.0_92-b14.I have looked at all the responses and tested them all. I pretty much compiled them all into one as a 'Safety closure'. This in C#
Note: you can change the param from IModule app to that of the actual driver.
public class WebDriverCleaner { public static void CloseWebDriver(IModule app) { try { if (app?.GetDriver() != null) { app.GetDriver().Close(); Thread.Sleep(3000); // Gives time for everything to close before quiting app.GetDriver().Quit(); app.GetDriver().Dispose(); KillProcessAndChildren("chromedriver.exe"); // One more to make sure we get rid of them chromedrivers. } } catch (Exception e) { Console.WriteLine(e); throw; } } public static void KillProcessAndChildren(string p_name) { ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher ("Select * From Win32_Process Where Name = '" + p_name + "'"); ManagementObjectCollection moc = searcher.Get(); foreach (ManagementObject mo in moc) { try { KillProcessAndChildren(Convert.ToInt32(mo["ProcessID"])); } catch (ArgumentException) { break; } } } public static void KillProcessAndChildren(int pid) { ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher("Select * From Win32_Process Where ParentProcessID=" + pid); ManagementObjectCollection moc = searcher.Get(); foreach (ManagementObject mo in moc) { try { KillProcessAndChildren(Convert.ToInt32(mo["ProcessID"])); } catch { break; } } try { Process proc = Process.GetProcessById(pid); proc.Kill(); } catch (ArgumentException) { // Process already exited. } } } 1 Comment
I have this issue. I suspect its due to the version of Serenity BDD and Selenium. The chromedriver process never releases until the entire test suite finishes. There are only 97 tests, but having 97 processes eat up the memory of a server that hasn't much resources may be having an affect on the performance.
To address I did 2 things (this is specific to windows).
before each test (annotated with @Before) get the process id (PID) of the chromedriver process with:
List<Integer> pids = new ArrayList<Integer>(); String out; Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("tasklist /FI \"IMAGENAME eq chromedriver.exe*\""); BufferedReader input = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream())); while ((out = input.readLine()) != null) { String[] items = StringUtils.split(out, " "); if (items.length > 1 && StringUtils.isNumeric(items[1])) { pids.add(NumberUtils.toInt(items[1])); } }after each test (annotated with @After) kill the PID with:
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("taskkill /F /PID " + pid);
Comments
I am using Protractor with directConnect. Disabling the "--no-sandbox" option fixed the issue for me.
// Capabilities to be passed to the webdriver instance. capabilities: { 'directConnect': true, 'browserName': 'chrome', chromeOptions: { args: [ //"--headless", //"--hide-scrollbars", "--disable-software-rasterizer", '--disable-dev-shm-usage', //"--no-sandbox", "incognito", "--disable-gpu", "--window-size=1920x1080"] } }, Comments
So, nothing worked for me. What I ended up doing was setting a unique ID on my addArguments to launch chromedriver, then when I want to quit I do something like this:
opts.addArguments(...args, 'custompid' + randomId()); Then to make sure it quits:
await this.driver.close() await this.driver.quit() spawn(`kill $(ps aux | grep ${RANDOM_PID_HERE} | grep -v "grep" | awk '{print $2}')`).on('error', e => { /* ignores when grep returns empty */ }) Ugly af, but it's the only thing that worked for my case.
Comments
I came here initially thinking surely this would have been answered/resolved but after reading all the answers I was a bit surprised no one tried to call all three methods together:
try { blah } catch { blah } finally { driver.Close(); // Close the chrome window driver.Quit(); // Close the console app that was used to kick off the chrome window driver.Dispose(); // Close the chromedriver.exe } I was only here to look for answers and didn't intend to provide one. So the above solution is based on my experience only. I was using chrome driver in a C# console app and I was able to clean up the lingering processes only after calling all three methods together.
Comments
Observed on version 3.141.0:
If you initialize your ChromeDriver with just ChromeOptions, quit() will not close out chromedriver.exe.
ChromeOptions chromeOptions = new ChromeOptions(); ChromeDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(chromeOptions); // .. do stuff .. driver.quit() If you create and pass in a ChromeDriverService, quit() will close chromedriver.exe out correctly.
ChromeDriverService driverService = ChromeDriverService.CreateDefaultService(); ChromeOptions chromeOptions = new ChromeOptions(); ChromeDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(driverService, chromeOptions); // .. do stuff .. driver.quit() 1 Comment
I have used the below in nightwatch.js in afterEach hooks.
afterEach: function(browser, done) { // performing an async operation setTimeout(function() { // finished async duties done(); browser.closeWindow(); browser.end(); }, 200); } .closeWindow() just simply closes the window. (But wont work for multiple windows opened). Whereas .end() ends all the remaining chrome processes.
