680

I am using rabbitmq and a simple python sample from here together with docker-compose. My problem is that I need to wait for rabbitmq to be fully started. From what I searched so far, I don't know how to wait with container x (in my case worker) until y (rabbitmq) is started.

I found this blog post where he checks if the other host is online. I also found this docker command:

wait

Usage: docker wait CONTAINER [CONTAINER...]

Block until a container stops, then print its exit code.

Waiting for a container to stop is maybe not what I am looking for but if it is, is it possible to use that command inside the docker-compose.yml? My solution so far is to wait some seconds and check the port, but is this the way to achieve this? If I don't wait, I get an error.

docker-compose.yml

worker: build: myapp/. volumes: - myapp/.:/usr/src/app:ro links: - rabbitmq rabbitmq: image: rabbitmq:3-management 

python hello sample (rabbit.py):

import pika import time import socket pingcounter = 0 isreachable = False while isreachable is False and pingcounter < 5: s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) try: s.connect(('rabbitmq', 5672)) isreachable = True except socket.error as e: time.sleep(2) pingcounter += 1 s.close() if isreachable: connection = pika.BlockingConnection(pika.ConnectionParameters( host="rabbitmq")) channel = connection.channel() channel.queue_declare(queue='hello') channel.basic_publish(exchange='', routing_key='hello', body='Hello World!') print (" [x] Sent 'Hello World!'") connection.close() 

Dockerfile for worker:

FROM python:2-onbuild RUN ["pip", "install", "pika"] CMD ["python","rabbit.py"] 

Update Nov 2015:

A shell script or waiting inside your program is maybe a possible solution. But after seeing this Issue I am looking for a command or feature of docker/docker-compose itself.

They mention a solution for implementing a health check, which may be the best option. A open tcp connection does not mean your service is ready or may remain ready. In addition to that I need to change my entrypoint in my dockerfile.

So I am hoping for an answer with docker-compose on board commands, which will hopefully the case if they finish this issue.

Update March 2016

There is a proposal for providing a built-in way to determine if a container is "alive". So docker-compose can maybe make use of it in near future.

Update June 2016

It seems that the healthcheck will be integrated into docker in Version 1.12.0

Update January 2017

I found a docker-compose solution see: Docker Compose wait for container X before starting Y

3
  • 3
    Using healthchecks in has been deprecated in docker-compose 2.3 to encourage making distributed systems fault tolerant. See: docs.docker.com/compose/startup-order Commented Jul 11, 2017 at 15:29
  • I've run across this problem several times. You can overcome it, but docker-compose is going to fight you every step of the way. If you want setup-test-teardown container control, you're better of with something like conducto. Commented Dec 18, 2020 at 2:21
  • 2
    @Kmaid Update: Support for healthchecks and depends_on.condition has actually made a comeback in v3. So you CAN actually use it — see release notes (the important bit is where it says v2 and v3 specs have been merged) + here are the latest specs. Commented Dec 20, 2022 at 20:06

21 Answers 21

651

Finally found a solution with a docker-compose method. Since docker-compose file format 2.1 you can define healthchecks.

I did it in a example project you need to install at least docker 1.12.0+. I also needed to extend the rabbitmq-management Dockerfile, because curl isn't installed on the official image.

Now I test if the management page of the rabbitmq-container is available. If curl finishes with exitcode 0 the container app (python pika) will be started and publish a message to hello queue. Its now working (output).

docker-compose (version 2.1):

version: '2.1' services: app: build: app/. depends_on: rabbit: condition: service_healthy links: - rabbit rabbit: build: rabbitmq/. ports: - "15672:15672" - "5672:5672" healthcheck: test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:15672"] interval: 30s timeout: 10s retries: 5 

output:

rabbit_1 | =INFO REPORT==== 25-Jan-2017::14:44:21 === rabbit_1 | closing AMQP connection <0.718.0> (172.18.0.3:36590 -> 172.18.0.2:5672) app_1 | [x] Sent 'Hello World!' healthcheckcompose_app_1 exited with code 0 

Dockerfile (rabbitmq + curl):

FROM rabbitmq:3-management RUN apt-get update RUN apt-get install -y curl EXPOSE 4369 5671 5672 25672 15671 15672 

Version 3 no longer supports the condition form of depends_on. So i moved from depends_on to restart on-failure. Now my app container will restart 2-3 times until it is working, but it is still a docker-compose feature without overwriting the entrypoint.

docker-compose (version 3):

version: "3" services: rabbitmq: # login guest:guest image: rabbitmq:management ports: - "4369:4369" - "5671:5671" - "5672:5672" - "25672:25672" - "15671:15671" - "15672:15672" healthcheck: test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:15672"] interval: 30s timeout: 10s retries: 5 app: build: ./app/ environment: - HOSTNAMERABBIT=rabbitmq restart: on-failure depends_on: - rabbitmq links: - rabbitmq 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

24 Comments

@svenhornberg ping uses ICMP so doesn't support TCP ports. Maybe nc to test a TCP port. Probably better to use psql -h localhost -p 5432 and query something.
How can healthchecks still be used to control startup order if depends_on with condition has been removed?
unfortunately, restart: on-failure is not an option in case of running tests :C
Hard to believe this such a pain still
Note that the support for depends_on.<service>.condition has actually made a comeback in v3 (and v2, of course), so you can use it — see release notes and here are the latest specs.
|
135

Quite recently they've added the depends_on feature.

Edit:

As of compose version 2.1+ till version 3 you can use depends_on in conjunction with healthcheck to achieve this:

From the docs:

version: '2.1' services: web: build: . depends_on: db: condition: service_healthy redis: condition: service_started redis: image: redis db: image: redis healthcheck: test: "exit 0" 

Before version 2.1

You can still use depends_on, but it only effects the order in which services are started - not if they are ready before the dependant service is started.

It seems to require at least version 1.6.0.

Usage would look something like this:

version: '2' services: web: build: . depends_on: - db - redis redis: image: redis db: image: postgres 

From the docs:

Express dependency between services, which has two effects:

  • docker-compose up will start services in dependency order. In the following example, db and redis will be started before web.
  • docker-compose up SERVICE will automatically include SERVICE’s dependencies. In the following example, docker-compose up web will also create and start db and redis.

Note: As I understand it, although this does set the order in which containers are loaded. It does not guarantee that the service inside the container has actually loaded.

For example, you postgres container might be up. But the postgres service itself might still be initializing within the container.

6 Comments

dnephin wrote: depends_on is only ordering. To actually delay the starting of another container there would need to be some way to detect when a process has finished initializing itself.
depends_on doesn't wait until the container is in ready state(whatever that can mean in your case). It only waits until the container is in 'running' state.
@akauppi I don't find any such quote. Instead I see that version 3 does support depends_on (with a note about how it's not supported if you deploy in swarm mode) See docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/compose-file-v3/… And I've tested locally with docker-compose version 3.7 and it does support depends_on with the condition form.
@akauppi Sure, I recognize a lot has likely changed since then. Even though this question/answer is old it still appears high in search results for how to manage startup order in Docker. Other devs may stumble across these comments as I did and may find updates useful. I suppose the condition form of depends_on was removed at some point and later restored.
Thank you so much, especially for explanation and reference to docs. I solved my problem with your help.
|
89

Natively that is not possible, yet. See also this feature request.

So far you need to do that in your containers CMD to wait until all required services are there.

In the Dockerfiles CMD you could refer to your own start script that wraps starting up your container service. Before you start it, you wait for a depending one like:

Dockerfile

FROM python:2-onbuild RUN ["pip", "install", "pika"] ADD start.sh /start.sh CMD ["/start.sh"] 

start.sh

#!/bin/bash while ! nc -z rabbitmq 5672; do sleep 3; done python rabbit.py 

Probably you need to install netcat in your Dockerfile as well. I do not know what is pre-installed on the python image.

There are a few tools out there that provide easy to use waiting logic, for simple tcp port checks:

For more complex waits:

2 Comments

Could you explain what you mean by CMD ? Does this mean my programm has to do it, like i did it with a port check ? Or do you mean a specific CMD from e.g. linux for this ?
thank you for explaining, I upvote your answer.But I think the upcoming feature request, would be the right answer to my question so I leave it unanswered so far.
68

Using restart: unless-stopped or restart: always may solve this problem.

If worker container stops when rabbitMQ is not ready, it will be restarted until it is.

3 Comments

I like this solution for this case, but it doesn't work for containers that don't exit when one of the subprocesses that it runs fails. For example, a Tomcat container would continue to run even if a Java servlet that it ran were to fail to connect to a database server. Granted, Docker containers render servlet containers like Tomcat mostly unnecessary.
@DerekMahar, if you have a Java-based web application that only serves REST calls, what do you use instead of Jetty/Tomcat?
@JoeG, I meant Tomcat the servlet container that can host many applications, not embedded Tomcat. Docker renders the former mostly unnecessary, while making the latter more popular for microservices, for example.
39

If you want to start service only then another service successfully completed (for example migration, data population, etc), docker-compose version 1.29, comes with build in functionality for this - service_completed_successfully.

depends_on: <service-name>: condition: service_completed_successfully 

According to specification:

service_completed_successfully - specifies that a dependency is expected to run to successful completion before starting a dependent service

3 Comments

This is really nice! Would you recommend using this over using healthcheck? What are the differences between the two?
@SeanWilliam no, the purpose of the healthcheck is different, it should to determine whenever container is healthy. depends_on with service_completed_successfully condition can be used for setup, for example create service's database, populate db with data, run migrations, run dependency install, etc.. - instead of putting all setup inside single container, you can separate the whole setup to small dedicated containers, and than configure the actual service to be dependent on setup containers with service_completed_successfully
@zooblin When I use it it just pauses for me after the depended on service completes, the depending service just doesn't happen, any help?
23

you can also just add it to the command option eg.

command: bash -c "sleep 5; start.sh" 

https://github.com/docker/compose/issues/374#issuecomment-156546513

to wait on a port you can also use something like this

command: bash -c "while ! curl -s rabbitmq:5672 > /dev/null; do echo waiting for xxx; sleep 3; done; start.sh" 

to increment the waiting time you can hack a bit more:

command: bash -c "for i in {1..100} ; do if ! curl -s rabbitmq:5672 > /dev/null ; then echo waiting on rabbitmq for $i seconds; sleep $i; fi; done; start.sh" 

2 Comments

Effective and easy to use: this is a good answer.
Does not work if the container to be started does not include bash or the sleep command.
21

restart: on-failure did the trick for me..see below

--- version: '2.1' services: consumer: image: golang:alpine volumes: - ./:/go/src/srv-consumer working_dir: /go/src/srv-consumer environment: AMQP_DSN: "amqp://guest:guest@rabbitmq:5672" command: go run cmd/main.go links: - rabbitmq restart: on-failure rabbitmq: image: rabbitmq:3.7-management-alpine ports: - "15672:15672" - "5672:5672" 

Comments

14

For container start ordering use

depends_on: 

For waiting previous container start use script

entrypoint: ./wait-for-it.sh db:5432 

This article will help you https://docs.docker.com/compose/startup-order/

1 Comment

@svenhornberg in the comment, you link, there is no explanation about wait-for-it.sh feature.
14

Tried many different ways, but liked the simplicity of this: https://github.com/ufoscout/docker-compose-wait

The idea that you can use ENV vars in the docker compose file to submit a list of services hosts (with ports) which should be "awaited" like this: WAIT_HOSTS: postgres:5432, mysql:3306, mongo:27017.

So let's say you have the following docker-compose.yml file (copy/past from repo README):

version: "3" services: mongo: image: mongo:3.4 hostname: mongo ports: - "27017:27017" postgres: image: "postgres:9.4" hostname: postgres ports: - "5432:5432" mysql: image: "mysql:5.7" hostname: mysql ports: - "3306:3306" mySuperApp: image: "mySuperApp:latest" hostname: mySuperApp environment: WAIT_HOSTS: postgres:5432, mysql:3306, mongo:27017 

Next, in order for services to wait, you need to add the following two lines to your Dockerfiles (into Dockerfile of the services which should await other services to start):

ADD https://github.com/ufoscout/docker-compose-wait/releases/download/2.5.0/wait /wait RUN chmod +x /wait 

The complete example of such sample Dockerfile (again from the project repo README):

FROM alpine ## Add your application to the docker image ADD MySuperApp.sh /MySuperApp.sh ## Add the wait script to the image ADD https://github.com/ufoscout/docker-compose-wait/releases/download/2.5.0/wait /wait RUN chmod +x /wait ## Launch the wait tool and then your application CMD /wait && /MySuperApp.sh 

For other details about possible usage see README

3 Comments

I was looking for similiar answer. I've usually worked with hub.docker.com/r/dadarek/wait-for-dependencies as it uses netcat underneath. The one you've provided is Rust-based. Can't comment on the quality of yours, but for me no additional layers is a definite pro.
I strongly recommend against this on grounds of security. You're running an arbitrary executable from a hyperlink. A better solution would be to do the same thing with a static script that's copied in to the image with COPY
@PaulK of course, it's understandable that running anything from hyperlink is not secure, but it's just a demo above how to make https://github.com/ufoscout/docker-compose-wait library working :) The way how you use that library does not change an answer that you can utilize some lib. Security is a complex topic and if we go far, we should check what that library is doing inside anyway, even if we COPY it :) So better to be more specific in your comment like: "I strongly recommend against the usage of that library from hyperlink". Hope you agree, thanks for a hint!
10

After trying several approaches, IMO the simplest and most elegant option is using the jwilder/dockerize utility image (mentioned by @Henrik Sachse but he did not show a concret example) with its -wait flag. Here is a simple example where I need a RabbitMQ to be ready before starting my app:

version: "3.8" services: # Start RabbitMQ. rabbit: image: rabbitmq # Wait for RabbitMQ to be joinable. check-rabbit-started: image: jwilder/dockerize:0.6.1 depends_on: - rabbit command: 'dockerize -wait=tcp://rabbit:5672' # Only start myapp once RabbitMQ is joinable. myapp: image: myapp:latest depends_on: - check-rabbit-started 

2 Comments

This is a very nice solution! Worked great for me. Thank you!
working yet simple solution. thnx!
7

You can also solve this by setting an endpoint which waits for the service to be up by using netcat (using the docker-wait script). I like this approach as you still have a clean command section in your docker-compose.yml and you don't need to add docker specific code to your application:

version: '2' services: db: image: postgres django: build: . command: python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000 entrypoint: ./docker-entrypoint.sh db 5432 volumes: - .:/code ports: - "8000:8000" depends_on: - db 

Then your docker-entrypoint.sh:

#!/bin/sh postgres_host=$1 postgres_port=$2 shift 2 cmd="$@" # wait for the postgres docker to be running while ! nc $postgres_host $postgres_port; do >&2 echo "Postgres is unavailable - sleeping" sleep 1 done >&2 echo "Postgres is up - executing command" # run the command exec $cmd 

This is nowadays documented in the official docker documentation.

PS: You should install netcat in your docker instance if this is not available. To do so add this to your Docker file :

RUN apt-get update && apt-get install netcat-openbsd -y 

Comments

6

basing on this blog post https://8thlight.com/blog/dariusz-pasciak/2016/10/17/docker-compose-wait-for-dependencies.html

I configured my docker-compose.yml as shown below:

version: "3.1" services: rabbitmq: image: rabbitmq:3.7.2-management-alpine restart: always environment: RABBITMQ_HIPE_COMPILE: 1 RABBITMQ_MANAGEMENT: 1 RABBITMQ_VM_MEMORY_HIGH_WATERMARK: 0.2 RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_USER: "rabbitmq" RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_PASS: "rabbitmq" ports: - "15672:15672" - "5672:5672" volumes: - data:/var/lib/rabbitmq:rw start_dependencies: image: alpine:latest links: - rabbitmq command: > /bin/sh -c " echo Waiting for rabbitmq service start...; while ! nc -z rabbitmq 5672; do sleep 1; done; echo Connected!; " volumes: data: {} 

Then I do for run =>:

docker-compose up start_dependencies

rabbitmq service will start in daemon mode, start_dependencies will finish the work.

4 Comments

lol, making query via "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:15672" for which u need to install management plugin and using healthcheck that already deprecated - its best answer. Simple working example with check via nc its - downvote. ha, ok...
the answer does not use a native docker feature, its irrelevant if you use curl, nc or other tools. while! nc is the same as already posted in other answers.
@IgorKomar, thanks man, you saved my day! :3 I used almost same mechanic to check mysql server is ready before actual application is started. ;) I am passing similar command to the docker-compose run --name app-test --rm "app" bash -l -c 'echo Waiting for mysql service start... && while ! nc -z db-server 3306; do sleep 1; done && echo Connected! && /bin/bash /script/ci_tests.sh'
5

There is a ready to use utility called "docker-wait" that can be used for waiting.

1 Comment

Thank you, but it is only a shell script so it is like h3nrik answer or waiting inside python. It is not a feature of docker-compose itself. May you have a look in github.com/docker/compose/issues/374 they plan to implement a healthcheck which would be the best way. A open tcp connection does not mean your service is ready or may remain ready. In addition to that I need to change my entrypoint in my dockerfile.
4

In version 3 of a Docker Compose file, you can use RESTART.

For example:

docker-compose.yml

worker: build: myapp/. volumes: - myapp/.:/usr/src/app:ro restart: on-failure depends_on: - rabbitmq rabbitmq: image: rabbitmq:3-management 

Note that I used depends_on instead of links since the latter is deprecated in version 3.

Even though it works, it might not be the ideal solution since you restart the docker container at every failure.

Have a look to RESTART_POLICY as well. it let you fine tune the restart policy.

When you use Compose in production, it is actually best practice to use the restart policy :

Specifying a restart policy like restart: always to avoid downtime

Comments

3

Not recommended for serious deployments, but here is essentially a "wait x seconds" command.

With docker-compose version 3.4 a start_period instruction has been added to healthcheck. This means we can do the following:

docker-compose.yml:

version: "3.4" services: # your server docker container zmq_server: build: context: ./server_router_router dockerfile: Dockerfile # container that has to wait zmq_client: build: context: ./client_dealer/ dockerfile: Dockerfile depends_on: - zmq_server healthcheck: test: "sh status.sh" start_period: 5s 

status.sh:

#!/bin/sh exit 0 

What happens here is that the healthcheck is invoked after 5 seconds. This calls the status.sh script, which always returns "No problem". We just made zmq_client container wait 5 seconds before starting!

Note: It's important that you have version: "3.4". If the .4 is not there, docker-compose complains.

3 Comments

As a naive "wait 5s" solution, this one's quite ingenious. I would upvote, but I won't because this doesn't really work with prod-like setups and I'm afraid that someone would look at number of votes instead reading carefully. Still, I wanted to say "man, that's smart" ;)
PS. For more complicated solutions, see the Evereq's answer
That's not what start_period does. That configuration means there is a grace period where failed health checks don't count as retries. If it succeeds early, it's considered healthy. After the start period, a failure will count as a retry. See docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#healthcheck
1

One of the alternative solution is to use a container orchestration solution like Kubernetes. Kubernetes has support for init containers which run to completion before other containers can start. You can find an example here with SQL Server 2017 Linux container where API container uses init container to initialise a database

https://www.handsonarchitect.com/2018/08/understand-kubernetes-object-init.html

1 Comment

This would be my suggestion too. Sure the hacks work but a little bit of elbow grease gets you a TON more out of k8s.
1

I currently also have that requirement of waiting for some services to be up and running before others start. Also read the suggestions here and on some other places. But most of them require that the docker-compose.yml some how has to be changed a bit. So I started working on a solution which I consider to be an orchestration layer around docker-compose itself and I finally came up with a shell script which I called docker-compose-profile. It can wait for tcp connection to a certain container even if the service does not expose any port to the host directy. The trick I am using is to start another docker container inside the stack and from there I can (usually) connect to every service (as long no other network configuration is applied). There is also waiting method to watch out for a certain log message. Services can be grouped together to be started in a single step before another step will be triggered to start. You can also exclude some services without listing all other services to start (like a collection of available services minus some excluded services). This kind of configuration can be bundled to a profile. There is a yaml configuration file called dcp.yml which (for now) has to be placed aside your docker-compose.yml file.

For your question this would look like:

command: aliases: upd: command: "up -d" description: | Create and start container. Detach afterword. profiles: default: description: | Wait for rabbitmq before starting worker. command: upd steps: - label: only-rabbitmq only: [ rabbitmq ] wait: - 5@tcp://rabbitmq:5432 - label: all-others 

You could now start your stack by invoking

dcp -p default upd 

or even simply by

dcp 

as there is only a default profile to run up -d on.

There is a tiny problem. My current version does not (yet) support special waiting condition like the ony You actually need. So there is no test to send a message to rabbit.

I have been already thinking about a further waiting method to run a certain command on host or as a docker container. Than we could extend that tool by something like

... wait: - service: rabbitmq method: container timeout: 5 image: python-test-rabbit ... 

having a docker image called python-test-rabbit that does your check.

The benefit then would be that there is no need anymore to bring the waiting part to your worker. It would be isolated and stay inside the orchestration layer.

May be someone finds this helpful to use. Any suggestions are very welcome.

You can find this tool at https://gitlab.com/michapoe/docker-compose-profile

Comments

1

what you need to do instead of wait for script you can use diagnostoc provided by rabbitmq itself:

rabbitmq: image: rabbitmq:management container_name: rabbitmq ports: - "5672:5672" # AMQP port - "15672:15672" # Management UI environment: RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_USER: guest RABBITMQ_DEFAULT_PASS: guest healthcheck: test: rabbitmq-diagnostics check_port_connectivity interval: 10s timeout: 5s retries: 10 start_period: 5s 

and then in what ever service that is dependent on rabbit just do:

rabbitmq: condition: service_healthy 

this fixed my problem!

Comments

1

I guess the docker people really want us to wait on services using code in our own images. I still want to configure the services to wait for in docker-compose.yml. Here's one way if you're willing to use an entrypoint script.

Add this loop to the end of your docker image's entrypoint script, using your choice of wait-for-it tool included in that image. I am using https://github.com/vishnubob/wait-for-it/. If you pass no service arguments, the loop does nothing.

for service in "$@"; do echo "$0: wait for service $service" if ! wait-for-it "$service"; then echo "$0: failed on service $service" exit 1 fi done 

Next, extend your docker-compose.yml file to pass an argument with required services that should be waited. Here's an example:

 command: ["my-data-svc:5000"] 

This relies on the behavior that docker "commands" are passed as arguments to the entrypoint script.

You can probably make a convincing argument that I'm abusing the intent of the docker command here. I'm not gonna die on that hill, it just works for me.

2 Comments

This solution is lacking context
@Levijatanu I'll be glad to extend please suggest what context to add here.
0

Here is the example where main container waits for worker when it start responding for pings:

version: '3' services: main: image: bash depends_on: - worker command: bash -c "sleep 2 && until ping -qc1 worker; do sleep 1; done &>/dev/null" networks: intra: ipv4_address: 172.10.0.254 worker: image: bash hostname: test01 command: bash -c "ip route && sleep 10" networks: intra: ipv4_address: 172.10.0.11 networks: intra: driver: bridge ipam: config: - subnet: 172.10.0.0/24 

However, the proper way is to use healthcheck (>=2.1).

Comments

-6

I just have 2 compose files and start one first and second one later. My script looks like that:

#!/bin/bash #before i build my docker files #when done i start my build docker-compose docker-compose -f docker-compose.build.yaml up #now i start other docker-compose which needs the image of the first docker-compose -f docker-compose.prod.yml up 

1 Comment

This is not considered a good practice. You cannot deliver the solution consisting of multiple conatiners from one compose file then.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.