298

In this particular case, I'd like to add a confirm in Bash for

 Are you sure? [Y/n] 

for Mercurial's hg push ssh://[email protected]//somepath/morepath, which is actually an alias. Is there a standard command that can be added to the alias to achieve it?

The reason is that hg push and hg out can sound similar and sometimes when I want hgoutrepo, I may accidentlly type hgpushrepo (both are aliases).

Update: if it can be something like a built-in command with another command, such as: confirm && hg push ssh://... that'd be great... just a command that can ask for a yes or no and continue with the rest if yes.

9
  • 1
    You will probably want to use a function instead of an alias. From info bash: "For almost every purpose, shell functions are preferred over aliases." Commented Jul 12, 2010 at 20:21
  • really? even for ones like ls -l or rm -i? Commented Jul 15, 2010 at 7:32
  • 7
    For almost every, not every. By the way, never do something like alias rm='rm -i'. One day, when you need it most, the alias won't be there and boom! something important will be lost. Commented Jul 16, 2010 at 9:02
  • wait, if you don't have the alias for rm -i, then you cannot count on having a shell script as well. So do you always type rm -i every time? Commented Aug 3, 2010 at 21:24
  • 12
    It's about habits. You could create an alias like the one in my previous comment and be in the habit of typing rm and expecting the -i behavior, then one day the alias is not there (for some reason it gets unset or not set or you're on a different system) and you type rm and it goes ahead immediately deleting stuff without confirmation. Oops! However, if you did an alias like alias askrm='rm -i' then you'd be OK, since you'd get a "command not found" error. Commented Aug 3, 2010 at 22:29

20 Answers 20

449

These are more compact and versatile forms of Hamish's answer. They handle any mixture of upper and lower case letters:

read -r -p "Are you sure? [y/N] " response case "$response" in [yY][eE][sS]|[yY]) do_something ;; *) do_something_else ;; esac 

Or, for Bash >= version 3.2:

read -r -p "Are you sure? [y/N] " response if [[ "$response" =~ ^([yY][eE][sS]|[yY])$ ]] then do_something else do_something_else fi 

Note: If $response is an empty string, it will give an error. To fix, simply add quotation marks: "$response". – Always use double quotes in variables containing strings (e.g.: prefer to use "$@" instead $@).

Or, Bash 4.x:

read -r -p "Are you sure? [y/N] " response response=${response,,} # tolower if [[ "$response" =~ ^(yes|y)$ ]] ... 

Edit:

In response to your edit, here's how you'd create and use a confirm command based on the first version in my answer (it would work similarly with the other two):

confirm() { # call with a prompt string or use a default read -r -p "${1:-Are you sure? [y/N]} " response case "$response" in [yY][eE][sS]|[yY]) true ;; *) false ;; esac } 

To use this function:

confirm && hg push ssh://.. 

or

confirm "Would you really like to do a push?" && hg push ssh://.. 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

14 Comments

Actually it should be [y/N] and not [Y/n] for the current test.
Worth mentioning that if you want to check not equal to on the second example, you should cast the $response variable. Eg: if [[ ! $response =~ ^([yY][eE][sS]|[yY])$ ]].
Nice general purpose yes/no function. supports a prompt strong, and optionally making 'y' or 'n' default.
@henning [Yy][eE][sS] is a whole thing. So that case will pass the 'yes' in any case-sensitivity form of inputs like YES YEs YeS Yes yES yEs yeS yes. or simply if you can use Y or y also as | [yY] is combined in that.
@wkw Broken link. Nice general purpose yes/no function: current version; archived copy of orig.
|
27

Here is roughly a snippet that you want. Let me find out how to forward the arguments.

read -p "Are you sure you want to continue? <y/N> " prompt if [[ $prompt == "y" || $prompt == "Y" || $prompt == "yes" || $prompt == "Yes" ]] then # http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1537673/how-do-i-forward-parameters-to-other-command-in-bash-script else exit 0 fi 

Watch out for yes | command name here :)

Comments

23

Confirmations are easily bypassed with carriage returns, and I find it useful to continually prompt for valid input.

Here's a function to make this easy. "invalid input" appears in red if Y|N is not received, and the user is prompted again.

prompt_confirm() { while true; do read -r -n 1 -p "${1:-Continue?} [y/n]: " REPLY case $REPLY in [yY]) echo ; return 0 ;; [nN]) echo ; return 1 ;; *) printf " \033[31m %s \n\033[0m" "invalid input" esac done } # example usage prompt_confirm "Overwrite File?" || exit 0 

You can change the default prompt by passing an argument

Comments

14

To avoid explicitly checking for these variants of 'yes' you could use the bash regular expression operator '=~' with a regular expression:

read -p "Are you sure you want to continue? <y/N> " prompt if [[ $prompt =~ [yY](es)* ]] then (etc...) 

That tests whether the user input starts with 'y' or 'Y' and is followed by zero or more 'es's.

1 Comment

[yY]* would be the same as [yY](es)* in this case.
9

This may be a hack:

as in question In Unix / Bash, is "xargs -p" a good way to prompt for confirmation before running any command?

we can using xargs to do the job:

echo ssh://[email protected]//somepath/morepath | xargs -p hg push 

of course, this will be set as an alias, like hgpushrepo

Example:

$ echo foo | xargs -p ls -l ls -l foo?...y -rw-r--r-- 1 mikelee staff 0 Nov 23 10:38 foo $ echo foo | xargs -p ls -l ls -l foo?...n $ 

Comments

9

This may be a little too short, but for my own private use, it works great

read -n 1 -p "Push master upstream? [Y/n] " reply; if [ "$reply" != "" ]; then echo; fi if [ "$reply" = "${reply#[Nn]}" ]; then git push upstream master fi 

The read -n 1 just reads one character. No need to hit enter. If it's not a 'n' or 'N', it is assumed to be a 'Y'. Just pressing enter means Y too.

(as for the real question: make that a bash script and change your alias to point to that script instead of what is was pointing to before)

1 Comment

This should pretty much be the accepted solution. Ts asked for [Y/n], but almost everyone else gave [y/N] answers.
5

No pressing enter required

Here's a longer, but reusable and modular approach:

  • Returns 0=yes and 1=no
  • No pressing enter required - just a single character
  • Can press enter to accept the default choice
  • Can disable default choice to force a selection
  • Works for both zsh and bash.

Defaulting to "no" when pressing enter

Note that the N is capitalsed. Here enter is pressed, accepting the default:

$ confirm "Show dangerous command" && echo "rm *" Show dangerous command [y/N]? 

Also note, that [y/N]? was automatically appended. The default "no" is accepted, so nothing is echoed.

Re-prompt until a valid response is given:

$ confirm "Show dangerous command" && echo "rm *" Show dangerous command [y/N]? X Show dangerous command [y/N]? y rm * 

Defaulting to "yes" when pressing enter

Note that the Y is capitalised:

$ confirm_yes "Show dangerous command" && echo "rm *" Show dangerous command [Y/n]? rm * 

Above, I just pressed enter, so the command ran.

No default on enter - require y or n

$ get_yes_keypress "Here you cannot press enter. Do you like this" Here you cannot press enter. Do you like this [y/n]? k Here you cannot press enter. Do you like this [y/n]? Here you cannot press enter. Do you like this [y/n]? n $ echo $? 1 

Here, 1 or false was returned. Note no capitalisation in [y/n]?

Code

# Read a single char from /dev/tty, prompting with "$*" # Note: pressing enter will return a null string. Perhaps a version terminated with X and then remove it in caller? # See https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/367880/143394 for dealing with multi-byte, etc. function get_keypress { local REPLY IFS= >/dev/tty printf '%s' "$*" [[ $ZSH_VERSION ]] && read -rk1 # Use -u0 to read from STDIN # See https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/383197/143394 regarding '\n' -> '' [[ $BASH_VERSION ]] && </dev/tty read -rn1 printf '%s' "$REPLY" } # Get a y/n from the user, return yes=0, no=1 enter=$2 # Prompt using $1. # If set, return $2 on pressing enter, useful for cancel or defualting function get_yes_keypress { local prompt="${1:-Are you sure} [y/n]? " local enter_return=$2 local REPLY # [[ ! $prompt ]] && prompt="[y/n]? " while REPLY=$(get_keypress "$prompt"); do [[ $REPLY ]] && printf '\n' # $REPLY blank if user presses enter case "$REPLY" in Y|y) return 0;; N|n) return 1;; '') [[ $enter_return ]] && return "$enter_return" esac done } # Credit: http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/14444/143394 # Prompt to confirm, defaulting to NO on <enter> # Usage: confirm "Dangerous. Are you sure?" && rm * function confirm { local prompt="${*:-Are you sure} [y/N]? " get_yes_keypress "$prompt" 1 } # Prompt to confirm, defaulting to YES on <enter> function confirm_yes { local prompt="${*:-Are you sure} [Y/n]? " get_yes_keypress "$prompt" 0 } 

Comments

4

Add the following to your /etc/bashrc file. This script adds a resident "function" instead of an alias called "confirm".


function confirm( ) { #alert the user what they are about to do. echo "About to $@...."; #confirm with the user read -r -p "Are you sure? [Y/n]" response case "$response" in [yY][eE][sS]|[yY]) #if yes, then execute the passed parameters "$@" ;; *) #Otherwise exit... echo "ciao..." exit ;; esac } 

2 Comments

Nice. Some minor corrections, though: you should put double-quotes around $response and $@ to avoid misparses, there are some redundant semicolons, and the * condition should return, not exit.
Just to be clear, it's the single semicolons at the end of some statements that are unnecessary.
4
read -r -p "Are you sure? [Y/n]" response response=${response,,} # tolower if [[ $response =~ ^(yes|y| ) ]] || [[ -z $response ]]; then your-action-here fi 

2 Comments

So a space character means yes?
All but 'yes or y' will confirm the action, so you are right! @xen2050
3

Well, here's my version of confirm, modified from James' one:

function confirm() { local response msg="${1:-Are you sure} (y/[n])? "; shift read -r $* -p "$msg" response || echo case "$response" in [yY][eE][sS]|[yY]) return 0 ;; *) return 1 ;; esac } 

These changes are:

  1. use local to prevent variable names from colliding
  2. read use $2 $3 ... to control its action, so you may use -n and -t
  3. if read exits unsuccessfully, echo a line feed for beauty
  4. my Git on Windows only has bash-3.1 and has no true or false, so use return instead. Of course, this is also compatible with bash-4.4 (the current one in Git for Windows).
  5. use IPython-style "(y/[n])" to clearly indicate that "n" is the default.

Comments

3

I like to exit as soon as possible if the user isn't sure, and I like the code to be readable and short. Depending on whether you'd like the user to press Return after their answer or not,

With pressing Return,

read -p "Warning: something scary: Continue (Y/N)? " reply [ "$reply" != "Y" ] && [ "$reply" != "y" ] && echo "Aborting" && exit 1 echo "Scary thing" 

or if you prefer not to wait for the user to press Return,

read -n1 -p "Warning: something scary: Continue (Y/N)? " reply echo "" [ "$reply" != "Y" ] && [ "$reply" != "y" ] && echo "Aborting" && exit 1 echo "Scary thing" 

The other answers have the background on that -n1 flag and other options for read. The echo "" in the 2nd variant is to make subsequent output appear on a new line since the user doesn't have to press Return, so no newline has been echoed to the terminal. Also notice $reply being in quotation marks thus "$reply" to handle the situation where the user presses Return without specifying Y or N resulting in $reply being empty; the quotation marks prevent this breaking the tests, as discussed here.

1 Comment

@OscarVanL, Wouldn't it be to not proceed? That is what the code above is doing. Only case insensitive y is accepted.
2

This version allows you to have more than one case y or Y, n or N

  1. Optionally: Repeat the question until an approve question is provided

  2. Optionally: Ignore any other answer

  3. Optionally: Exit the terminal if you want

    confirm() { echo -n "Continue? y or n? " read REPLY case $REPLY in [Yy]) echo 'yup y' ;; # you can change what you do here for instance [Nn]) break ;; # exit case statement gracefully # Here are a few optional options to choose between # Any other answer: # 1. Repeat the question *) confirm ;; # 2. ignore # *) ;; # 3. Exit terminal # *) exit ;; esac # REPLY='' } 

Notice this too: On the last line of this function clear the REPLY variable. Otherwise if you echo $REPLY you will see it is still set until you open or close your terminal or set it again.

Comments

1

Late to the game, but I created yet another variant of the confirm functions of previous answers:

confirm () { read -r -p "$(echo $@) ? [y/N] " YESNO if [ "$YESNO" != "y" ]; then echo >&2 "Aborting" exit 1 fi CMD="$1" shift while [ -n "$1" ]; do echo -en "$1\0" shift done | xargs -0 "$CMD" || exit $? } 

To use it:

confirm your_command 

Features:

  • prints your command as part of the prompt
  • passes arguments through using the NULL delimiter
  • preserves your command's exit state

Bugs:

  • echo -en works with bash but might fail in your shell
  • might fail if arguments interfere with echo or xargs
  • a zillion other bugs because shell scripting is hard

Comments

1

Try,

 #!/bin/bash pause () { REPLY=Y while [ "$REPLY" == "Y" ] || [ "$REPLY" != "y" ] do echo -e "\t\tPress 'y' to continue\t\t\tPress 'n' to quit" read -n1 -s case "$REPLY" in "n") exit ;; "N") echo "case sensitive!!" ;; "y") clear ;; "Y") echo "case sensitive!!" ;; * ) echo "$REPLY is Invalid Option" ;; esac done } pause echo "Hi" 

Comments

0

This isn't exactly an "asking for yes or no" but just a hack: alias the hg push ... not to hgpushrepo but to hgpushrepoconfirmedpush and by the time I can spell out the whole thing, the left brain has made a logical choice.

2 Comments

But you know that you will use the TAB key!
ok, true, but at least i will glance at the command and see it is weird and think twice before hitting Enter
0

Not the same, but idea that works anyway.

#!/bin/bash i='y' while [ ${i:0:1} != n ] do # Command(s) read -p " Again? Y/n " i [[ ${#i} -eq 0 ]] && i='y' done 

Output:
Again? Y/n N
Again? Y/n Anything
Again? Y/n 7
Again? Y/n &
Again? Y/n nsijf
$

Now only checks 1st character of $i read.

Comments

0

Below code is combining two things

  1. shopt -s nocasematch that will take care of case insensitive

  2. and if condition that will accept both the input either you pass yes,Yes,YES,y.

    shopt -s nocasematch

    if [[ sed-4.2.2.$LINE =~ (yes|y)$ ]]

    then exit 0

    fi

Comments

0

Here is my solution that using localised regex. So in german also "j" for "Ja" would be interpreted as yes.

First argument is the question, if the second argument is "y" than yes would be the default answer otherwise no would be the default answer. The return value is 0 if the answer was "yes" and 1 if the answer was "no".

function shure(){ if [ $# -gt 1 ] && [[ "$2" =~ ^[yY]*$ ]] ; then arg="[Y/n]" reg=$(locale noexpr) default=(0 1) else arg="[y/N]" reg=$(locale yesexpr) default=(1 0) fi read -p "$1 ${arg}? : " answer [[ "$answer" =~ $reg ]] && return ${default[1]} || return ${default[0]} } 

Here is a basic usage

# basic example default is no shure "question message" && echo "answer yes" || echo "answer no" # print "question message [y/N]? : " # basic example default set to yes shure "question message" y && echo "answer yes" || echo "answer no" # print "question message [Y/n]? : " 

Comments

0

I know this is an old question but this might help someone, it hasn't been addressed here.

I have been asked how to use rm -i in a script which is receiving input from a file. As file input to a script is normally received from STDIN we need to change it, so that only the response to the rm command is received from STDIN. Here's the solution:

#!/bin/bash while read -u 3 line do echo -n "Remove file $line?" read -u 1 -n 1 key [[ $key = "y" ]] && rm "$line" echo done 3<filelist 

If ANY key other than the "y" key (lower case only) is pressed, the file will not be deleted. It is not necessary to press return after the key (hence the echo command to send a new line to the display). Note that the POSIX bash "read" command does not support the -u switch so a workaround would need to be sought.

Comments

0

Yes default base on Dennis Williamson answer

#!/bin/bash confirm() { # call with a prompt string or use a default read -r -p "${1:-Are you sure?} [Y/n] " response case "$response" in @([nN])*([oO])) false ;; *) true ;; esac } 

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.