121

Given the following table in SQL Server 2005:

ID Col1 Col2 Col3 -- ---- ---- ---- 1 3 34 76 2 32 976 24 3 7 235 3 4 245 1 792 

What is the best way to write the query that yields the following result (i.e. one that yields the final column - a column containing the minium values out of Col1, Col2, and Col 3 for each row)?

ID Col1 Col2 Col3 TheMin -- ---- ---- ---- ------ 1 3 34 76 3 2 32 976 24 24 3 7 235 3 3 4 245 1 792 1 

UPDATE:

For clarification (as I have said in the coments) in the real scenario the database is properly normalized. These "array" columns are not in an actual table but are in a result set that is required in a report. And the new requirement is that the report also needs this MinValue column. I can't change the underlying result set and therefore I was looking to T-SQL for a handy "get out of jail card".

I tried the CASE approach mentioned below and it works, although it is a bit cumbersome. It is also more complicated than stated in the answers because you need to cater for the fact that there are two min values in the same row.

Anyway, I thought I'd post my current solution which, given my constraints, works pretty well. It uses the UNPIVOT operator:

with cte (ID, Col1, Col2, Col3) as ( select ID, Col1, Col2, Col3 from TestTable ) select cte.ID, Col1, Col2, Col3, TheMin from cte join ( select ID, min(Amount) as TheMin from cte UNPIVOT (Amount for AmountCol in (Col1, Col2, Col3)) as unpvt group by ID ) as minValues on cte.ID = minValues.ID 

I'll say upfront that I don't expect this to offer the best performance, but given the circumstances (I can't redesign all the queries just for the new MinValue column requirement), it is a pretty elegant "get out of jail card".

3
  • 13
    IMHO the author's UNPIVOT solution is superior to the other answers. Commented Nov 11, 2011 at 11:31
  • 3
    I find Nizam's solution to be the leanest solution, even if it took me a while to start understanding it. Lean and very usable. Commented Aug 27, 2015 at 15:09
  • You can now use least in SQL Server 2022+. (Commenting as the recent answers suggesting this are still a fair way down the page.) Commented Sep 6, 2024 at 5:19

21 Answers 21

81

Using CROSS APPLY:

SELECT ID, Col1, Col2, Col3, MinValue FROM YourTable CROSS APPLY (SELECT MIN(d) AS MinValue FROM (VALUES (Col1), (Col2), (Col3)) AS a(d)) A 

SQL Fiddle

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

8 Comments

Looks interesting but I can't get this to work. Could you perhaps explicit a bit ? thx
@iDevlop I inserted the SQL Fiddle in my answer
The thing I did not know was the scalar function. It seems that your answer works also without the cross apply. Does it add value/performance ? stackoverflow.com/a/14712024/78522
@iDevlop If it not delivers performance, it increases readbility. For example, I could use something like where MinValue > 10, which I could not do without CROSS APPLY
indeed, I had the opportunity to understand the "reusability" benefit of it in the meantime. Thanks. I learned 2 things today ;-)
|
79

There are likely to be many ways to accomplish this. My suggestion is to use Case/When to do it. With 3 columns, it's not too bad.

Select Id, Case When Col1 < Col2 And Col1 < Col3 Then Col1 When Col2 < Col1 And Col2 < Col3 Then Col2 Else Col3 End As TheMin From YourTableNameHere 

7 Comments

This was my initial thought. But the real query needs 5 columns, and the number of columns could grow. So the CASE approach becomes a little unwieldy. But it does work.
If the number of columns could grow, you're definitely doing it wrong - see my post (the rant on why you shouldn't have your DB schema set up this way :-).
Thanks. As I mentioned in another comment. I'm not querying actual tables. The tables are normalised correctly. This query is part of a particularly complex query and is working on intermediate results from derived tables.
In that case, can you derive them differently so they look normalized?
An add on to the answer from @Gmastros as I ran into the issue that some of the Cols had matching data so I had to add the = sign. My data also had the potential for null so I had to add in the or statement to account for that. There maybe an easier way to do this but I have not found one in the past 6 months I have been looking. Thanks to everyone involved here. Select Id, CaseWhen (Col1 <= Col2 OR Col2 is null) And (Col1 <= Col3 OR Col3 is null) Then Col1 When (Col2 <= Col1 OR Col1 is null) And (Col2 <= Col3 OR Col3 is null) Then Col2 Else Col3 End As TheMin From YourTableNameHere
|
74
SELECT ID, Col1, Col2, Col3, (SELECT MIN(Col) FROM (VALUES (Col1), (Col2), (Col3)) AS X(Col)) AS TheMin FROM Table 

The OP was tagged as sql-server, and this is an SQL Server specific answer. May not work on other DBMSs. (Search for least for Postgres derived DBs and some others).

5 Comments

Thanks for the catch. I'd missed that tag. I actually don't know, and don't have the ability to test it either. Will be more dilligent in checking tags going forward.
Hands down the more elegant solution - not sure why it doesn't have more upvotes.
For inline max/min calcs this is by far the best way to do this
In 2022, this solution doesn't work for Google BigQuery - perhaps that's also the case for other RDBMS. Error is 'Syntax error: Expected keyword JOIN but got ","'
@magiclantern The OP is tagged with sql-server, so the answer is sql-server.
34

On MySQL, use this:

select least(col1, col2, col3) FROM yourtable 

Also supported in Postgres 8.1+ and SQL Server 2022+ (16.x) (And Synapse, Fabric, etc)

9 Comments

but in some cases it is. for those, this is a wonderful answer
This non-standard SQL extension is supported by pretty much every database except Microsoft SQL server.
LEAST works in the latest version of Microsoft SQL Server Managed Instances, as of ~12 days ago. reddit.com/r/SQLServer/comments/k0dj2r/…
For any readers using SQLLite, The min function works like least in SQLLite, but takes NULL if any value is NULL. See this related question.
|
19

As of SQL Server 2022, you can use the LEAST function:

SELECT LEAST(3, 2, 1) -- 1 SELECT LEAST(3, 2, NULL) -- 2 

This function ignores NULL values, contrary to the SQL standard.
There is also the GREATEST function.


For earlier versions, you can use the "brute force" approach with a twist:

SELECT CASE WHEN Col1 <= Col2 AND Col1 <= Col3 THEN Col1 WHEN Col2 <= Col3 THEN Col2 ELSE Col3 END AS [Min Value] FROM [Your Table] 

When the first when condition fails it guarantees that Col1 is not the smallest value therefore you can eliminate it from rest of the conditions. Likewise for subsequent conditions. For five columns your query becomes:

SELECT CASE WHEN Col1 <= Col2 AND Col1 <= Col3 AND Col1 <= Col4 AND Col1 <= Col5 THEN Col1 WHEN Col2 <= Col3 AND Col2 <= Col4 AND Col2 <= Col5 THEN Col2 WHEN Col3 <= Col4 AND Col3 <= Col5 THEN Col3 WHEN Col4 <= Col5 THEN Col4 ELSE Col5 END AS [Min Value] FROM [Your Table] 

Note that if there is a tie between two or more columns then <= ensures that we exit the CASE statement as early as possible.

1 Comment

Use <= instead, otherwise, the last matching min value will be used instead of the first.
6

If the columns were integers as in your example I would create a function:

create function f_min_int(@a as int, @b as int) returns int as begin return case when @a < @b then @a else coalesce(@b,@a) end end 

then when I need to use it I would do :

select col1, col2, col3, dbo.f_min_int(dbo.f_min_int(col1,col2),col3) 

if you have 5 colums then the above becomes

select col1, col2, col3, col4, col5, dbo.f_min_int(dbo.f_min_int(dbo.f_min_int(dbo.f_min_int(col1,col2),col3),col4),col5) 

2 Comments

Given the ridiculously bad performance of scalar functions in MSSQL I'm feeling obliged to advice against this approach. If you'd go this road than at least write a function that takes all 5 columns as parameters at once. It's still going to be bad, but at least a bit less bad =/
Recursion will reduce the performance. But it will meet the requirement.
5

This is brute force but works

 select case when col1 <= col2 and col1 <= col3 then col1 case when col2 <= col1 and col2 <= col3 then col2 case when col3 <= col1 and col3 <= col2 then col3 as 'TheMin' end from Table T 

... because min() works only on one column and not across columns.

1 Comment

It also tends to be the fastest since MIN creates implicit nested loop join.
5

You could also do this with a union query. As the number of columns increase, you would need to modify the query, but at least it would be a straight forward modification.

Select T.Id, T.Col1, T.Col2, T.Col3, A.TheMin From YourTable T Inner Join ( Select A.Id, Min(A.Col1) As TheMin From ( Select Id, Col1 From YourTable Union All Select Id, Col2 From YourTable Union All Select Id, Col3 From YourTable ) As A Group By A.Id ) As A On T.Id = A.Id 

2 Comments

This works but performance will degrade when the row count rises.
Thanks. Yes this works. As Tomalak says, in my realword query this would be quite nasty for performance. But +1 for effort. :)
5

The best way to do that is probably not to do it - it's strange that people insist on storing their data in a way that requires SQL "gymnastics" to extract meaningful information, when there are far easier ways to achieve the desired result if you just structure your schema a little better :-)

The right way to do this, in my opinion, is to have the following table:

ID Col Val -- --- --- 1 1 3 1 2 34 1 3 76 2 1 32 2 2 976 2 3 24 3 1 7 3 2 235 3 3 3 4 1 245 4 2 1 4 3 792 

with ID/Col as the primary key (and possibly Col as an extra key, depending on your needs). Then your query becomes a simple select min(val) from tbl and you can still treat the individual 'old columns' separately by using where col = 2 in your other queries. This also allows for easy expansion should the number of 'old columns' grow.

This makes your queries so much easier. The general guideline I tend to use is, if you ever have something that looks like an array in a database row, you're probably doing something wrong and should think about restructuring the data.


However, if for some reason you can't change those columns, I'd suggest using insert and update triggers and add another column which these triggers set to the minimum on Col1/2/3. This will move the 'cost' of the operation away from the select to the update/insert where it belongs - most database tables in my experience are read far more often than written so incurring the cost on write tends to be more efficient over time.

In other words, the minimum for a row only changes when one of the other columns change, so that's when you should be calculating it, not every time you select (which is wasted if the data isn't changing). You would then end up with a table like:

ID Col1 Col2 Col3 MinVal -- ---- ---- ---- ------ 1 3 34 76 3 2 32 976 24 24 3 7 235 3 3 4 245 1 792 1 

Any other option that has to make decisions at select time is usually a bad idea performance-wise, since the data only changes on insert/update - the addition of another column takes up more space in the DB and will be slightly slower for the inserts and updates but can be much faster for selects - the preferred approach should depend on your priorities there but, as stated, most tables are read far more often than they're written.

8 Comments

Um. Thanks for the diatribe. The real database is properly normalized. This was a simple example. The actual query is complicated and the 5 columns I am interested in are intermediate results from derived tables.
The diatribe still stands unfortunately. Making intermediate tables of the form you suggest is every bit as problematic as making permanent tables like that. This is evidenced by the fact that you have to perform what I like to call SQL gymnastics to get the result you want.
If there are genuine reasons for needing the 'array' in a single row, feel free to enlighten us, but using it to select the minimum value is not one of them.
+1 for the trigger suggestion to preserve the original (if flawed) table structure.
What if you are dealing with a Hierarchy table, joined to it self?
|
2

Both this question And this question try to answer this.

The recap is that Oracle has a built in function for this, with Sql Server you are stuck either defining a user-defined-function or using case statements.

Comments

2

For multiple columns its best to use a CASE statement, however for two numeric columns i and j you can use simple math:

min(i,j) = (i+j)/2 - abs(i-j)/2

This formula can be used to get the minimum value of multiple columns but its really messy past 2, min(i,j,k) would be min(i,min(j,k))

Comments

1

If you're able to make a stored procedure, it could take an array of values, and you could just call that.

4 Comments

Oracle has a function called LEAST() that does exactly what you want.
Thanks for rubbing that in :) I can't believe that SQL Server doesn't have an equivalent!
I was even going to say, "Hey, my favourite pgsql doesn't have it either," but it actually does. ;) The function itself wouldn't be tough to write though.
Oh, except that T-SQL doesn't even have array support (???) Well, I guess you could have a five-parameter function and if you need more just extend it...
1
select *, case when column1 < columnl2 And column1 < column3 then column1 when columnl2 < column1 And columnl2 < column3 then columnl2 else column3 end As minValue from tbl_example 

1 Comment

This is a duplicate of G Mastros' answer, so if you should wonder: I guess that's where down-vote comes from.
1

A little twist on the union query:

DECLARE @Foo TABLE (ID INT, Col1 INT, Col2 INT, Col3 INT) INSERT @Foo (ID, Col1, Col2, Col3) VALUES (1, 3, 34, 76), (2, 32, 976, 24), (3, 7, 235, 3), (4, 245, 1, 792) SELECT ID, Col1, Col2, Col3, ( SELECT MIN(T.Col) FROM ( SELECT Foo.Col1 AS Col UNION ALL SELECT Foo.Col2 AS Col UNION ALL SELECT Foo.Col3 AS Col ) AS T ) AS TheMin FROM @Foo AS Foo 

Comments

1

If you use SQL 2005 you can do something neat like this:

;WITH res AS ( SELECT t.YourID , CAST(( SELECT Col1 AS c01 , Col2 AS c02 , Col3 AS c03 , Col4 AS c04 , Col5 AS c05 FROM YourTable AS cols WHERE YourID = t.YourID FOR XML AUTO , ELEMENTS ) AS XML) AS colslist FROM YourTable AS t ) SELECT YourID , colslist.query('for $c in //cols return min(data($c/*))').value('.', 'real') AS YourMin , colslist.query('for $c in //cols return avg(data($c/*))').value('.', 'real') AS YourAvg , colslist.query('for $c in //cols return max(data($c/*))').value('.', 'real') AS YourMax FROM res 

This way you don't get lost in so many operators :)

However, this could be slower than the other choice.

It's your choice...

2 Comments

Well, like I said, this could be slow, but if you have too many columns (obviously, as a result of a really bad DB design!), it could worth using this (at least for AVG). You didn't give me any hint if it's a good holy cow or a bad one:) Maybe you should use the up/down vote to help me figure out.
It wasn't really a good or a bad one ;). I'm no database expert, so I was just saying "holy cow" because the question seemed like it would have a trivial answer. I guess it's a good one since you managed to provide a flexible, extensible solution to the problem!
1

If you know what values you are looking for, usually a status code, the following can be helpful:

select case when 0 in (PAGE1STATUS ,PAGE2STATUS ,PAGE3STATUS, PAGE4STATUS,PAGE5STATUS ,PAGE6STATUS) then 0 else 1 end FROM CUSTOMERS_FORMS 

Comments

1

Below I use a temp table to get the minimum of several dates. The first temp table queries several joined tables to get various dates (as well as other values for the query), the second temp table then gets the various columns and the minimum date using as many passes as there are date columns.

This is essentially like the union query, the same number of passes are required, but may be more efficient (based on experience, but would need testing). Efficiency wasn't an issue in this case (8,000 records). One could index etc.

--==================== this gets minimums and global min if object_id('tempdb..#temp1') is not null drop table #temp1 if object_id('tempdb..#temp2') is not null drop table #temp2 select r.recordid , r.ReferenceNumber, i.InventionTitle, RecordDate, i.ReceivedDate , min(fi.uploaddate) [Min File Upload], min(fi.CorrespondenceDate) [Min File Correspondence] into #temp1 from record r join Invention i on i.inventionid = r.recordid left join LnkRecordFile lrf on lrf.recordid = r.recordid left join fileinformation fi on fi.fileid = lrf.fileid where r.recorddate > '2015-05-26' group by r.recordid, recorddate, i.ReceivedDate, r.ReferenceNumber, i.InventionTitle select recordid, recorddate [min date] into #temp2 from #temp1 update #temp2 set [min date] = ReceivedDate from #temp1 t1 join #temp2 t2 on t1.recordid = t2.recordid where t1.ReceivedDate < [min date] and t1.ReceivedDate > '2001-01-01' update #temp2 set [min date] = t1.[Min File Upload] from #temp1 t1 join #temp2 t2 on t1.recordid = t2.recordid where t1.[Min File Upload] < [min date] and t1.[Min File Upload] > '2001-01-01' update #temp2 set [min date] = t1.[Min File Correspondence] from #temp1 t1 join #temp2 t2 on t1.recordid = t2.recordid where t1.[Min File Correspondence] < [min date] and t1.[Min File Correspondence] > '2001-01-01' select t1.*, t2.[min date] [LOWEST DATE] from #temp1 t1 join #temp2 t2 on t1.recordid = t2.recordid order by t1.recordid 

Comments

1
SELECT [ID], ( SELECT MIN([value].[MinValue]) FROM ( VALUES ([Col1]), ([Col1]), ([Col2]), ([Col3]) ) AS [value] ([MinValue]) ) AS [MinValue] FROM Table; 

Comments

0

I know that question is old, but I was still in the need of the answer and was not happy with other answers so I had to devise my own which is a twist on @paxdiablo´s answer.


I came from land of SAP ASE 16.0, and I only needed a peek at statistics of certain data which are IMHO validly stored in different columns of a single row (they represent different times - when arrival of something was planned, what it was expected when the action started and finally what was the actual time). Thus I had transposed columns into the rows of temporary table and preformed my query over this as usually.

N.B. Not the one-size-fits-all solution ahead!

CREATE TABLE #tempTable (ID int, columnName varchar(20), dataValue int) INSERT INTO #tempTable SELECT ID, 'Col1', Col1 FROM sourceTable WHERE Col1 IS NOT NULL INSERT INTO #tempTable SELECT ID, 'Col2', Col2 FROM sourceTable WHERE Col2 IS NOT NULL INSERT INTO #tempTable SELECT ID, 'Col3', Col3 FROM sourceTable WHERE Col3 IS NOT NULL SELECT ID , min(dataValue) AS 'Min' , max(dataValue) AS 'Max' , max(dataValue) - min(dataValue) AS 'Diff' FROM #tempTable GROUP BY ID 

This took some 30 seconds on source set of 630000 rows and used only index-data, so not the thing to run in time-critical process but for things like one-time data inspection or end-of-the-day report you might be fine (but verify this with your peers or superiors, please!). Main bonus of this style for me was that I could readily use more/less columns and change grouping, filtering, etc., especially once data was copyied over.

The additional data (columnName, maxes, ...) were to aid me in my search, so you might not need them; I left them here to maybe spark some ideas :-).

Comments

0

case when Col1 < Col2 and Col1 < Col3 then Col1 when Col2 is null and Col3 is null then Col1 when Col1 < Col2 and Col3 is null then Col1 when Col1 < Col3 and Col2 is null then Col1 when Col2 < Col1 and Col2 < Col3 then Col2 when Col1 is null and Col3 is null then Col2 when Col2 < Col1 and Col3 is null then Col2 when Col2 < Col3 and Col1 is null then Col2 when Col3 < Col1 and Col3 < Col2 then Col3 when Col1 is null and Col2 is null then Col3 when Col3 < Col1 and Col2 is null then Col3 when Col3 < Col2 and Col1 is null then Col3 when Col2 = Col3 then Col2 when Col1 = Col3 then Col1 when Col1 = Col2 then Col1 when Col2 = Col3 and Col1 = Col3 then Col1
else null end as 'MIN'

1 Comment

This was the only way I could successfully do it with 3 columns with null values
0

As of SQL Server 2022 (and Azure SQL Database), you can use LEAST() function.

SELECT LEAST('6.62', 3.1415, N'7') AS LeastVal; SELECT LEAST('Glacier', N'Joshua Tree', 'Mount Rainier') AS LeastString; SELECT LEAST(P.SellStartDate, P.OtherDate, P.ThirdDate) AS EarliestDate FROM SalesLT.Product AS P 

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/logical-functions-least-transact-sql?view=azure-sqldw-latest

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.