I have would like to be able to treat a method declared as void T::f() as void (*)(T*). Is this a valid conversion (ie can it be safely called and the first argument will be put into this)?
Related questions
Related questions
- The Overflow Blog
-
-
- Featured on Meta
-
-
-
Hot Network Questions
- When (if ever) did common people address each other as "comrade" in China and Russia/the Soviet Union?
- What should I do if my foreshadowing was too obvious and readers picked up on it immediately?
- Why are they called Terafim?
- PSE Advent Calendar 2025 (Day 1): The Wish List
- Would keeping all coils on be a good way to surpass the coilgun timing problem?
- Does an equipment unattach when it becomes a creature?
- What is the difference between the classical decision theoretic setting and the decision theoretic setting in ML and statistical learning?
- Toilet bowl filling up with water
- xcolor not fully colouring commutative diagrams drawn by tikzcd
- Did an Iranian organization use millions of dollars to promote Shia (branch of Islam) in Japan and only a single person converted?
- Unexpected parenthesis for custom notation
- What insect lays these relatively large flat tan eggs?
- How to execute machine code in QuickBasic under DosBox?
- Why does mass appear in both the Einstein Field Equations, and the equations of motion of particles interacting via non-gravitational forces
- Why is Sophocles's play typically known by a Latin title?
- Rear pressure bulkhead
- How do i show that the outermorphism of a linear transformation is basis independent
- What is the nature of a triangle for which the square of the diameter of its circumcircle is equal to the sum of the squares of two of its sides?
- Run WinSCP as FTP server
- Is non-gavage fois gras available in France?
- TV series about a vampire schoolboy
- What is the meaning of this Spanish road sign symbols?
- One engine Inoperative - Aerodynamics
- Apparent contradiction between Matt. 17:13 and John 1:21
lang-cpp
[](T* t){ t->f(); }