Timeline for Why is my shared variance negative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 14, 2020 at 16:51 | history | suggested | Chris Tang | CC BY-SA 4.0 | reformat the content to increase readability |
| Mar 14, 2020 at 15:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 14, 2020 at 16:51 | |||||
| May 28, 2014 at 7:04 | comment | added | ttnphns | ...so, .325-(.172^2+.174^2+.465^2+.164^2)=.022 is the shared portion of explained variation in Y. No it isn't negative and cannot be negative. | |
| May 28, 2014 at 6:53 | comment | added | ttnphns | Not positive semipartial correlation coefficients but squared ones. You may use Venn diagram (such as at the bottom of stats.stackexchange.com/a/73876/3277) to think about it all | |
| May 27, 2014 at 16:19 | answer | added | AdamO | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 27, 2014 at 16:17 | review | First posts | |||
| May 27, 2014 at 16:17 | |||||
| May 27, 2014 at 15:59 | history | asked | stealthting2014 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |