Timeline for Linear mixed model interaction not significant but post-hoc tests significant
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2020 at 21:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 11, 2020 at 4:10 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 6:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 10, 2019 at 2:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 6, 2019 at 13:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 7:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 18:46 | answer | added | user171973 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:56 | comment | added | amoeba | "Significant" is an arbitrary threshold, so if you have p=0.51 in one case and p=0.49 in another, there is no real inconsistency. Apart from that, different procedures have different assumptions and pairwise t-tests might not be equivalent to your mixed model analysis for various possible reasons. Showing model output and/or sharing data is the standard practice on this forum. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:53 | comment | added | carsten | fair enough, that's possible. i hoped for some general advise on how to deal with the situation of having non significant interaction term but significant post-hoc tests. or some reference to the literature. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:51 | comment | added | amoeba | FWIW, I don't think this will be answerable unless you show the summary output of your mixed model and post-hoc tests and/or post the data. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:50 | comment | added | carsten | Thanks amoeba. I was also just wondering why the question was down voted. The question refers to a genuine problem that I have and I also checked the standard statistic literature and couldn't find an answer. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:49 | history | edited | amoeba | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 35 characters in body |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:49 | comment | added | amoeba | Any explanation for downvote? The question appears ok to me. I upvote if only to counter-balance the downvote. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 10:14 | history | asked | carsten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |