Timeline for Filtering out bursts with a consistent range from a time series
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6 at 11:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 7 at 22:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 7 at 18:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 4, 2020 at 4:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 16:58 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | What do you mean by 'the motion'? How do you get to your observation of noise burst (how do you know that it is noise)? What pattern (that is being disturbed) should I see? What latest comment do you refer to(and what is KS-test?)? | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 16:00 | comment | added | CodeLover | @Martijn Weterings, the moving window method did not work well. I basically just suppressed the motion when it is not significantly different from the previous one. I considered noise burst more consistent based on observation whereas any other movement would disturb the pattern. Please see my latest comment as I adopted KS-test to improve the results. | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 15:47 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | "I defined a moving window of length 10 and whenever the standard deviation of the data within the window was smaller than some threshold, I suppressed it." I do not see how this works and why it is done. How does this filter out the peak at 68600 and how does this not filter the peak at 4560? | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 15:37 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | Optimization can be done by first using more of the prior information. Why do you regard the noise more 'consistent' in range? What model do you have behind this? | |
| Aug 7, 2018 at 17:12 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 7, 2018 at 11:01 | history | reopened | gung - Reinstate Monica | ||
| S Aug 4, 2018 at 12:07 | history | suggested | Wrzlprmft | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Trying to make the question understandable. |
| Aug 4, 2018 at 7:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 4, 2018 at 12:07 | |||||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 21:08 | history | closed | kjetil b halvorsen♦ Michael R. Chernick gung - Reinstate Monica | Needs details or clarity | |
| Aug 3, 2018 at 19:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 21:08 | |||||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 19:37 | history | edited | CodeLover | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 345 characters in body |
| Aug 3, 2018 at 18:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 19:02 | |||||
| Aug 3, 2018 at 18:50 | history | asked | CodeLover | CC BY-SA 4.0 |