Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you @EdM for your extremely insightful responses to this issue. My understanding is that you support the approach I have used which is great. I am currently submitting this article for publication in an academic journal, and therefore, need a reference in order to support my approach to the reviewers. Are you aware of any resources that directly address my issue that I could cite? Thank you once again! $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 26, 2022 at 19:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @ZacharyMcClean I happen to have this ancient text on hand. Section 16.2.2, page 180: "If the interaction effect is found to be significant, do not test the main effects even if they appear not to be significant. The estimation of the main effects and their significance is coding dependent when interactions are included in the model." Also, see this page and its links on whether you need to evaluate the significance of an initial ANOVA test when there are pre-planned comparisons. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 26, 2022 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @EdM I believe that this is perfect! $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2022 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ I think equivalence of the main effect with effect for the reference category holds true for a regression, but for ANOVA results do not depend on the reference group chosen, since comparison is wrt the grand mean, not a reference category: theanalysisfactor.com/… $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26, 2023 at 15:03