Skip to main content
Cross Validated

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This paper will likely be relevant for you, as it explained how Bayesian likelihoods comparison can be used instead of classical frequentist tests using the p-value: nature.com/articles/s41593-020-0660-4 $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 18, 2023 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to CV. The lack of response to your question suggests that there are not many adherents of the Likelihood school on this site. It is a pity that the statistician you consulted was so negative on the conventional statistical approaches involving estimated effects (both point and confidence intervals) and p-values. ctd ... $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ ... As the ASA Presidential taskforce states about p-values and significance tests "They are important tools that have advanced science through their proper application." Tools can still be useful even if other people misuse them. magazine.amstat.org/blog/2021/08/01/… $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 20:33