Timeline for Advice on optimal random-effects structure for not fully crossed repeated-measures design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024 at 13:40 | comment | added | jbuddy_13 | You might want to take into account Latino and Asian populations as well in this vignette. B/W might be too restrictive to lend any useful insights. | |
| May 10, 2024 at 13:30 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 32 characters in body |
| Feb 6, 2024 at 14:38 | answer | added | Erik Ruzek | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 4, 2024 at 16:48 | comment | added | nostatisfaction | @ErikRuzek, unfortunately the design is locked in at this time and not something I have the power to change due to a few constraints. But this is also only a pilot for now and we'll use a different design. Still, we'll have data and need to do something with it. Given these constraints, and accepting that within-participant variability cannot be modelled for the interaction, does the above model sound okay (at this stage, I should ask... the best we can do)? Or is there another way? | |
| Feb 3, 2024 at 21:04 | comment | added | Erik Ruzek | This was asked in the previous thread by @Sointu, and is worth asking again. Have you already collected this data or do you still have time to alter the design? The comments and answers in the other thread all seem to converge on the idea that this design is not particularly amenable to your stated research questions. You made it very difficult to de-confound race and homed/homeless in this design and it's not clear that they can be disentangled. | |
| Feb 2, 2024 at 15:15 | history | asked | nostatisfaction | CC BY-SA 4.0 |