Timeline for Modeling repeated measures data in R - Interpretation and Validation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2024 at 14:40 | answer | added | Erik Ruzek | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 14, 2024 at 11:05 | history | edited | Ed9012 | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 87 characters in body |
| Feb 14, 2024 at 1:13 | comment | added | Ed9012 | @PeterFlom It makes sense. However, in my case, time points reflect certain phase of the experiment, i.e. presentation of a stimulus, including baseline (no stimulus), stimulus presentation, and post-stimulus periods, so that I aim to compare the differences between two groups across different stimuli. While examining the marginal increase of the response variable over time is interesting, my primary focus is on comparing the differences between two groups at each stimulus-related time point. | |
| Feb 14, 2024 at 0:34 | comment | added | Peter Flom | Then you shouldn't make them catetgorical but number of seconds. | |
| Feb 13, 2024 at 23:29 | comment | added | Ed9012 | @PeterFlom the time interval between one timepoint and another is not always the same, e.g. timepoint1 lasts 120s, and so timepoint2, but timepoint3 lasts 520s. | |
| S Feb 13, 2024 at 22:52 | history | suggested | Preston Botter | CC BY-SA 4.0 | formatting |
| Feb 13, 2024 at 22:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 13, 2024 at 22:52 | |||||
| Feb 13, 2024 at 22:13 | comment | added | Peter Flom | Why do you have time as categorical? I'm not saying it's wrong to do so, but why do it? | |
| Feb 13, 2024 at 22:03 | history | asked | Ed9012 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |