Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ +1. I agree with what you say. As I mentioned in my original post : "over-dispersion (...) is how you "get around" the issue of having as many groups as observations." Thank you for making a better point of glmer in a conceptual manner. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2013 at 22:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the links! After reading those, and having a closer look at the fitted values from my model, I have a better idea of what's going on. I actually don't think what Ben is doing is appropriate for my analysis. He's using an observation-level variable to allow for overdispersion, so it's like a nuisance effect. For my analysis, distributor is an effect of interest: I want to see how distributors perform relative to each other when allowing for other variables. Thus it's more comparable to a conventional linear mixed model, where overfitting is a genuine concern. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 25, 2013 at 7:24