Timeline for Is normality testing 'essentially useless'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2022 at 18:05 | history | wiki removed | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | ||
| Nov 22, 2020 at 12:09 | comment | added | Alicja Kario | @BenBolker for small samples you are likely to have data that Shapiro-Wilk will say that's normal; for large sample sizes you are close to the asymptotic efficiency | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 1:44 | comment | added | Glen_b | I have explored relative efficiencies in small samples for a number of common tests; the small-sample relative efficiencies are typically lower than the ARE but at usual sample sizes generally not by very much; the ARE is generally a pretty useful guide. | |
| Jul 23, 2019 at 18:18 | comment | added | Ben Bolker | note that the efficiency of 0.95 is asymptotic: FWIW I'd guess that the efficiency is much lower for typical finite sample sizes ... (although admittedly I haven't seen this studied, nor tried to explore it myself) | |
| S Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 | history | answered | Frank Harrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Frank Harrell |