Timeline for LaTexing vs LaTexTools (Sublime text plugins)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 12, 2020 at 2:17 | history | suggested | drevicko | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added info on gitub repo and it's forks, and their inactivity |
| Mar 12, 2020 at 1:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 12, 2020 at 2:17 | |||||
| S Jan 13, 2019 at 19:05 | history | suggested | user170109 | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Changed link to historic page as site is now abandoned |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 18:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 13, 2019 at 19:05 | |||||
| Jul 26, 2018 at 18:26 | comment | added | Filip S. | Seems like the LaTeXing dev has stopped development completely now. He has put the source code on github though, but it doesn't seem like anyone has taken on keeping the project alive (none of the forks have any commits). | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 14:16 | vote | accept | SddS | ||
| Apr 9, 2017 at 14:12 | comment | added | SddS | I think nowadays with rise of Atom editor this answer should be updated to make it solid reasoning as Egon points it out. | |
| Aug 10, 2016 at 8:30 | comment | added | Egon | The same risk is actually present in the Sublime Text editor as a whole since it is also closed source, and there have also been times when the future of Sublime Text was unsure. That being said, I still enjoy ST3 and LaTeXing far more than most alternatives out there, so for me it is worth the risk. | |
| Apr 28, 2015 at 14:15 | comment | added | Alessandro Cuttin | LaTeXing is back under active development. Nonetheless it's an actual risk. | |
| Aug 16, 2014 at 7:18 | history | answered | Serge Stroobandt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |