Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • Please tell me the \coordinate command that is artificially making the diagram bigger than it is. I thought that I changed all the \path commands to \draw commands. I didn't see anything that placed points or lines more than a few millimeters above the arrowhead for line t. Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 22:52
  • I see where you used pgfinterruptboundingbox. It does not surround the code for the traversals s and t. I guess that you are saying the code that introduces the artificial white vertical spacing comes from my commands for drawing line k. Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 23:02
  • @user74973 (Well, paths, not specifically a \coordinate.) Just look at what's inside the pgfinterruptboundingbox environment ... There are five \path commands, the one named line_k is the one that goes the farthest up, while line_ell goes the farthest to the right, and line_m the farthes to the left. Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 23:02
  • 1
    @user74973 Change the five \paths in the pgfinterruptboundingbox to \draw, and you'll see quite clearly where most of the space comes from. Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 23:03
  • 1
    @user74973 And the extra space at the bottom comes from path_for_the_lower_arrowhead_of_s. Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 23:05