Timeline for When not to use \ensuremath for math macro?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://tex.stackexchange.com/ with https://tex.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 14:13 | comment | added | yo' | You forgot to mention \Z{n} $\times$ \Z{n} ;) | |
| Feb 20, 2013 at 7:32 | comment | added | h__ | I did this: \newcommand{\m}{\ensuremath} and on my editor whenever I hit m then tab I got \m{} appear and the caret is put between { and }. No messy $'s at all. | |
| Feb 20, 2013 at 7:29 | comment | added | egreg | @hyh Do you mean \ensuremath{a+b=c} instead of \(a+b=c\) or $a+b=c$? I'd consider it a perversion. ;-) | |
| Feb 20, 2013 at 6:52 | comment | added | h__ | Since you are doing this \ensuremath-only-when-really-needed campaign, let me ask here: what if I use only \ensuremath and no $'s? Will that still mess things up? I wrote quite a bit but haven't encounter problem with that strategy, I just want to know if it will eventually go wrong. | |
| Nov 23, 2011 at 10:38 | history | answered | egreg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |