Timeline for StylisticSet Command dose not work for some fonts
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2017 at 19:26 | vote | accept | Sushant | ||
| Sep 30, 2017 at 21:08 | answer | added | Thérèse | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 18:24 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | It has those particular glyphs, but they are not encoded as OpenType "stylistic variant" font features (like ss01, ss02). I don't see variant glyphs for the others (conjuncts etc.) either. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 18:03 | comment | added | Sushant | Noto Serif Devanagari does have stylistic variants. e. g. It has 2 different glyphs for the character श i. e. for Unicode character U+0936. The glyph names are dvSHA and dvSHA.MAR. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 16:54 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | Noto Serif Devanagari does not seem to have the stylistic variants — I tried otfinfo -f and also some other things (see the section on Calibri in this answer). What did you see in Fontforge that makes you think it does? | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 12:31 | comment | added | Sushant | Sorry! I have edited and corrected the code. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 12:30 | history | edited | Sushant | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 12:18 | comment | added | Sergei Golovan | In your example both Noto font families select stylistic set 1. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 9:42 | history | asked | Sushant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |