Timeline for page breaks directly after a section title
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2018 at 23:52 | history | edited | Mensch | CC BY-SA 3.0 | improved formatting |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 18:54 | answer | added | David Carlisle | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 18:43 | history | edited | David Carlisle | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 6 characters in body |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 18:42 | comment | added | David Carlisle | your comments about lists seem strange, you can have 1.1.1 numbering for nested lists if you wish, it seems that your are looking for lists which would also handle indenting the text. | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 18:06 | history | edited | Stephen O | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 65 characters in body |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 18:01 | history | edited | Stephen O | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 65 characters in body |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:50 | comment | added | EuklidAlexandria | You could insert \pagebreak after the section. | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:49 | comment | added | TH. | I don't fully understand what you're after, but the use of \paragraph for list items seems wrong. You should take a look at the enumitem package for that. For the rest, can you clarify exactly what you want by providing an example of how the text should look? Normally page breaks after section headers are poor style, and I'm not sure if titlesec supports such an option off hand. | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:49 | comment | added | Zarko | (i) welcome to tex.se! (ii) please provide complete bit small document where you show, what you like to obtain (iii) your request is very unusual. such behavior is (in normal circumstances) not desired (allowed) :-( | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:38 | |||||
| Mar 21, 2018 at 17:32 | history | asked | Stephen O | CC BY-SA 3.0 |