Skip to main content
Update with current improvements based on answers.
Source Link
orome
  • 10.8k
  • 15
  • 63
  • 119

I'm having trouble with the appearance of parentheses representing function arguments. They appear to far away from the function name.

For example the code

\left(1-f_{p}\left(l+1\right)\right)\overline{w}\left(l\right)f_{p}\left(l\right)\overline{N}\left(l\right)\hat{H}_{s}\left(l\right) 

produces

Expression, as rendered

in which the arguments seem to float midway between successive function names; but I'd prefer (and expect) something more like

Expression, adjusted for desired appearance

which does a better job of attaching the arguments to the function names.

Is there something I can do to achieve the result I'm looking for?


FWIW, I've settled (for now) on

\bigl(1\!-\! f_{p}(l\!+\!1)\bigr)\;\overline{w}(l)\; f_{p}(l)\;\,\overline{\! N}(l)\;\hat{H}_{s}(l) 

which produces

Expression, after improvements

I'm having trouble with the appearance of parentheses representing function arguments. They appear to far away from the function name.

For example the code

\left(1-f_{p}\left(l+1\right)\right)\overline{w}\left(l\right)f_{p}\left(l\right)\overline{N}\left(l\right)\hat{H}_{s}\left(l\right) 

produces

Expression, as rendered

in which the arguments seem to float midway between successive function names; but I'd prefer (and expect) something more like

Expression, adjusted for desired appearance

which does a better job of attaching the arguments to the function names.

Is there something I can do to achieve the result I'm looking for?

I'm having trouble with the appearance of parentheses representing function arguments. They appear to far away from the function name.

For example the code

\left(1-f_{p}\left(l+1\right)\right)\overline{w}\left(l\right)f_{p}\left(l\right)\overline{N}\left(l\right)\hat{H}_{s}\left(l\right) 

produces

Expression, as rendered

in which the arguments seem to float midway between successive function names; but I'd prefer (and expect) something more like

Expression, adjusted for desired appearance

which does a better job of attaching the arguments to the function names.

Is there something I can do to achieve the result I'm looking for?


FWIW, I've settled (for now) on

\bigl(1\!-\! f_{p}(l\!+\!1)\bigr)\;\overline{w}(l)\; f_{p}(l)\;\,\overline{\! N}(l)\;\hat{H}_{s}(l) 

which produces

Expression, after improvements

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackTeX/status/171875424933134336
Source Link
orome
  • 10.8k
  • 15
  • 63
  • 119

How do I get function argument parenthesis to position correctly?

I'm having trouble with the appearance of parentheses representing function arguments. They appear to far away from the function name.

For example the code

\left(1-f_{p}\left(l+1\right)\right)\overline{w}\left(l\right)f_{p}\left(l\right)\overline{N}\left(l\right)\hat{H}_{s}\left(l\right) 

produces

Expression, as rendered

in which the arguments seem to float midway between successive function names; but I'd prefer (and expect) something more like

Expression, adjusted for desired appearance

which does a better job of attaching the arguments to the function names.

Is there something I can do to achieve the result I'm looking for?