Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 1
    Are you sure you are allowed to do this (include the mini TOC)? The list of packages they allow seems curated, maintained and the page has been recently updated, so I think that they do not allow the titletoc package on purpose. Besides, in the same page they mention conversion to HTML, in which format this TOC would probably be irrelevant. I suggest that (a) first you ask explicitly if you are allowed to include this TOC, (b) if it is for just two (sub-)sections, you could produce it by hand, using a table (or similar), \ref and \pageref. They even use the zref package. Commented May 23 at 4:26
  • Thats the whole point. I am NOT allowed to use that. Thats why I am asking for an alternative Commented May 23 at 16:42
  • 1
    My question was whether you are allowed to include the mini TOC at all, not if you are allowed to use the package (you are not, obviously). Commented May 24 at 5:18