Timeline for Is there better method to declare tikz picture with proper baseline and fontsize?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16 at 6:18 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 98 characters in body |
| Jun 16 at 5:57 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 431 characters in body |
| Jun 16 at 5:52 | comment | added | Jasper Habicht | @Explorer I added a short TikZ snippet to my answer. I think with this, it better answers you original question now. | |
| Jun 16 at 5:51 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 431 characters in body |
| Jun 16 at 5:44 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 431 characters in body |
| Jun 15 at 2:56 | comment | added | Explorer | I get it, thanks! | |
| Jun 14 at 17:04 | comment | added | Jasper Habicht | @Explorer Right, your baseline approach is fine. But you should use coordinates or even just dimensions, not a node for alignment. You can just say baseline=0pt to shift the TikZ box vertically, so that (0,0) sits on the baseline of the surrounding text. The node in your code has actually no real use. Clipping is also not needed then. (I could have used a similar approach actually, but since I also wanted to define the width, I opted for a clip.) | |
| Jun 14 at 16:18 | comment | added | Explorer | However, as the problem of baseline remains vague for me. You have mentioned that "make sure that the baseline of the symbols is (for example) at (0em,0em) (via clipping or setting the bounding box of the symbol)." and with \draw_path_rectangle:nn { 0em , 0em } { 0.7em , 0.667em } and \draw_path_use_clear:n { clip } as l3draw version, could u paraphase the pure tikz's version to determine the baseline with bounding box or clip(just simple example)?Should I use baseline option, or clip similar rectangle? Best wishes! | |
| Jun 14 at 16:15 | comment | added | Explorer | Excellent, I have spared some time in l3draw, and get the point of your two versions extraordinary solution. Thanks! | |
| Jun 14 at 16:11 | vote | accept | Explorer | ||
| Jun 14 at 7:07 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 33 characters in body |
| Jun 13 at 14:21 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 918 characters in body |
| Jun 13 at 13:45 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 2906 characters in body |
| Jun 13 at 13:29 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 35 characters in body |
| Jun 13 at 13:23 | history | edited | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 35 characters in body |
| Jun 13 at 13:12 | comment | added | Jasper Habicht | It is a bit tricky to match the right weight as this depends on the font used. Also, different font sizes of Computer Modern have different weights. | |
| Jun 13 at 13:09 | history | answered | Jasper Habicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 |