I recently switched to using cleveref in my latex document. However, I have one case I still don't quite get right (or maybe it is just not covered in cleveref):
I use the subfigure-environment of the subcaptionpackage on a regular basis. In the caption of the main figure, I then use \subref{} to get only the label of the subfigure, e.g. (a) instead of 1a. The main advantage of cleveref is that I can type \cref{fig} and get the result of fig.~\ref{fig}, but this does not work for a subreference, because \cref always produces the full label (1a).
Is there a way to reproduce fig.~\subref{fig:a} using cleveref as well? I.e. can I use \cref to create a reference than only uses the subfigure label without the mainfigure label?
Edit: here is a MWE illustrating the problem:
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{mwe} \usepackage{subcaption} \usepackage{cleveref} \begin{document} \begin{figure} \centering \begin{subfigure}{.3\linewidth} \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{image-a} \caption{Figure 1a} \label{fig:a} \end{subfigure} \begin{subfigure}{.3\linewidth} \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{image-b} \caption{Figure 1b} \label{fig:b} \end{subfigure} \caption{Main figure caption} \label{fig} \end{figure} Using subcaption, I can link to \ref{fig}, \ref{fig:a} or to \subref{fig:a} alone. Using cleverref, I can also link to \cref{fig} and to \cref{fig:a}, However, I cannot link to \subref{fig:a} alone. \end{document} This produces the following result: 
Edit 2: To be extra clear: The point of using cleveref is to be able to write text references without the need to describe the nature of every label. But, if I can not create a subref version of the cref command, I am still stuck with manually typing those references, which, imho, makes not much sense. Either I use cleveref all the way, or not at all. So the question is, can I create a \cref variant of \subref?


\label{fig:1a}in MWE. Anyhow, what would you like to be the result of\subref{fig:a}? Also in your MWE you are just using the same command twice, i.e.\subref{fig:a}, in what respect do you expect it to give you a different result, the second time you invoke it? Are you saying you are missing a\csubref{}command? But again what would you like to see as a result? Imho saying fig. a is pretty meaningless in a document, because it does not refer to a distinct image, unless you intend to use it in the captions.