2

I have encountered a strange problem using the Devanagari font Shobhika in ConTeXt, where the rakaara forms are not formed properly in some glyphs.

Here is a sample document I am using to demonstrate the issue:

\setupbodyfont[shobhika] \definehighlight [wr] [color=red] \starttext \startcolumns दं‌ष्ट्रा ट्रा ट्रि ट्री ट्रो ट्रौ \column त्रिदल \wr{त्रेता} विक्रिय \wr{विक्रेता} क्रोड प्रीति \wr{प्रेप्सित} तच्छ्री \wr{श्रेष्ठ} \stopcolumns \stoptext

The typescript 'shobhika' above is as follows:

\starttypescript [serif] [shobhika] \definefontsynonym [Serif] [name:shobhikaregular] [features=devanagari-two] \definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [name:shobhikabold] [features=devanagari-two] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [shobhika] \definetypeface [shobhika] [rm] [serif] [shobhika] \stoptypescript

With this typescript, which I call 'dev2', I get the following output:

enter image description here

The rakaar forms are not formed properly (highlighted in red) in all cases but that of the ट-varga. The 'devanagari-two' features use the 'dev2' script tag.

Now if I use the following typescript instead (which uses the 'deva' script tag instead of 'dev2'),

\starttypescript [serif] [shobhika] \definefontsynonym [Serif] [name:shobhikaregular] [features=devanagari-one] \definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [name:shobhikabold] [features=devanagari-one] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [shobhika] \definetypeface [shobhika] [rm] [serif] [shobhika] \stoptypescript

with the document

\setupbodyfont[shobhika] \definehighlight [wr] [color=red] \starttext \startcolumns \wr{% दं‌ष्ट्रा ट्रा ट्रे } ट्रि ट्री \wr{% ट्रो ट्रौ} \column त्रिदल त्रेता विक्रिय विक्रेताक्रोड प्रीति प्रेप्सित \wr{तच्छ्री} श्रेष्ठ इन्द्रो \stopcolumns \stoptext

I get the following output :

enter image description here

Here the rakaar forms are not formed properly in the case of the ट-varga and for some glyphs involving the consonant छ.

Using the 'devanagari-one' typescript above, I am able to 'circumvent' this issue by writing those forms as follows

छ्र‌ +‌ ​​​​​ZWS + Devanagari vowel sign

where ZWS is the zero-width space U+200B.

I must mention here that I have not had any problems using Shobhika font in XeLaTeX with either the 'deva' or the 'dev2' script tags. I must also mention that I have tried some other Devanagari fonts in ConTeXt and have had no such issues. I have also looked through font-pre.mkiv of the ConTeXt source and experimented with a mix of the features and the script tags, quite unfortunately, to no avail. As suggested in the ConTeXt wiki, I have also consulted the MS page on this topic.

I have, over the past two years migrated entirely to ConTeXt for most typesetting uses. I am no expert in ConTeXt by any stretch, but at the same time, I would humbly submit that I am no novice either. As a student, I have had no problems using ConTeXt to produce stunning documents in English language with a large number of mathematics.

However, I must admit that I am not sure if this is an issue with ConTeXt or with the font itself. I will be very grateful for any help by members here.

Thanks, Kauśika

Improve this question
2
  • Not a proper solution or answer, but as a hack: Since you say you're able to circumvent it by inserting U+200B zero-width space (ZWS), have you considered just doing a regex-replace on your input file (in your text editor say)? Or maybe ConTeXt has something like LuaTeX's process_input_buffer that can automatically insert those / pretend they exist in your document? (BTW, if there are cases where ZWS doesn't help, also try ZWJ and ZWNJ.) Commented Sep 2, 2021 at 20:35
  • You mention that other fonts work correctly in ConTeXt. Then this is a font issue. Maybe there are some ligatures that are not defined in the font? It is possible to patch such fonts on the fly, but I don't know any details on that. It may be useful to ask on the context mailing list Commented Sep 10, 2021 at 16:43

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

I know nothing about devanagari. But the difference between xelatex and context is the difference between the context font renderer and harfbuzz.

You can test the difference with lualatex by setting the renderer explicitly:

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{fontspec} \setmainfont{Shobhika-Regular.otf}[Script=Devanagari] \setsansfont{Shobhika-Regular.otf}[Script=Devanagari,Renderer=Harfbuzz] \def\wr{} \begin{document} \begin{minipage}{2cm} त्रेता \end{minipage} \quad% \begin{minipage}{2cm} \sffamily त्रेता \end{minipage} \end{document}

enter image description here

There is probably not much you can do apart from reporting this to the context mailing list. context doesn't include harfbuzz so there is no option to switch to this renderer.

Improve this answer
1
  • Thanks very much for your response. I was hoping that font rendering would be the last thing to worry about here. I will now ask on the mailing list as you suggested. Hoping for a fix! Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 1:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.