Timeline for Which hash function is used when converting an address from raw bytes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2022 at 10:47 | comment | added | FFF | The address is itself a plain regular hash for KT1, whether written KT1…. or in bytes. Those are representations of the same thing. Tz* accounts are related to the underlying keys, no blake2b involved. | |
| May 27, 2022 at 4:30 | comment | added | 0x10 | so the raw bytes represent a hash of an address when it is a KT1, but represents an unhashed address when it is a tz addresses? | |
| May 27, 2022 at 1:12 | comment | added | FFF | This answer is also correct. KT1 addresses do involve hashing (blake2b if I remember well). However, conversions between byte representation and addresses don’t involve hashing. | |
| May 26, 2022 at 5:33 | comment | added | 0x10 | this is the answer that caused my confusion: tezos.stackexchange.com/a/3069/7981 - does this mean that the answer to that question is misleading? | |
| May 20, 2022 at 9:50 | history | answered | FFF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |