Timeline for Are requests for changes to the site design ignored by default?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 17:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| May 6, 2016 at 2:53 | comment | added | Wildcard | @Shog9, I would imagine that new requests can be tagged "status-deferred" instead of "status-declined," though—is that right? | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 14:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Migration of MSO links to MSE links | |
| Apr 16, 2013 at 0:32 | comment | added | Shog9 StaffMod | @jasonwryan: Retagging or commenting on this stuff probably takes about as much time as actually doing it. As aarthi noted, the long-term solution is... Just having enough manpower to actually get trivial stuff done without it becoming a major backlog. | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 23:59 | comment | added | jasonwryan | @Shog9 Then you have a gap in your comms... Of all of the questions I linked to, only one has an "official" (ie., red) tag, and that is status-declined. I would suggest status-deferred would be at least a step in the right direction. Either that or a comment that says "we hear ya". | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 23:39 | comment | added | Shog9 StaffMod | @jasonwryan: that tag already exists - status-planned. We try hard not to use it for anything that isn't at least being worked on right now - otherwise, it's essentially meaningless (or rather, it effectively means the same thing as status-deferred). | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 22:02 | vote | accept | jasonwryan | ||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 22:01 | comment | added | jasonwryan | Thank you for the comprehensive answer; it goes a long way to assuaging my concerns about if/how our views are heard. Perhaps we could add another tag, todo that the staff could use to signal that the request has been noted, agreed and will be actioned when time/resource allow? | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 21:46 | history | answered | AarthiStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |