Timeline for How can we encourage users not to post answers to a new OP question until we get all the details?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Nov 25, 2014 at 17:42 | vote | accept | Ramesh | ||
| Nov 22, 2014 at 3:35 | answer | added | jasonwryan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 2:34 | comment | added | Ramesh | I am just saying as regular users can't we wait for the OP to post what he wants clearly before giving the answers to him. I just want the OP to get a feel of how the community works. For instance, the answer by @slm is the one that clearly addresses the OP's question as slm's answer is based on what the OP had tried so far. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 2:29 | comment | added | user44370 | I think the cc by-sa license is not leveraged enough in explaining to new users that they're contributing to something akin to an encyclopedic work as opposed to a forum. In a forum you have this ping pong of unrestrained feedback which people are used to. I equate twitter to that too. It's about fostering care for the assets imho. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:27 | comment | added | DisplayName | @HaukeLaging Lol. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:26 | comment | added | Hauke Laging | @DisplayName "they" – very funny | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:26 | answer | added | Hauke Laging | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:10 | comment | added | DisplayName | I agree with this, but I think there is no way to stop people from answering, they want that karma! | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:09 | history | asked | Ramesh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |