Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Currently, the font specification calls Georgia as the primary serif font for question titles. While undeniably an attractive font, its zero renders almost exactly the same as a lower case letter 'o'. This introduces a significant level of ambiguity:

Georgia rendering a zero

While I think it extremely unlikely that there is a serif font that is readily available on most Unix user's machines that would have a slashed or dotted zero (the ideal), with only a small tweak to the CSS, it would be possible to improve the rendering of zeros for most users:

Times as the default

I'm reluctant to suggest a significant change as I think the overall look of the site is extremely professional - however, for a site for coders and geeks, having ambiguous zeros is rather unfortunate1.

With only a small change to the stylesheet, this can be improved. From:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 24px; ... } 

to:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: "Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 28px; ... } 

Is this something that others are similarly exercised about? Could it be considered for a change?

Other example questions where this has an impact (mentioned in chat):

UPDATE

Updated to highlight a couple of particularly egregious examples:

A shocker...

another more recent example of fail

Currently, the font specification calls Georgia as the primary serif font for question titles. While undeniably an attractive font, its zero renders almost exactly the same as a lower case letter 'o'. This introduces a significant level of ambiguity:

Georgia rendering a zero

While I think it extremely unlikely that there is a serif font that is readily available on most Unix user's machines that would have a slashed or dotted zero (the ideal), with only a small tweak to the CSS, it would be possible to improve the rendering of zeros for most users:

Times as the default

I'm reluctant to suggest a significant change as I think the overall look of the site is extremely professional - however, for a site for coders and geeks, having ambiguous zeros is rather unfortunate1.

With only a small change to the stylesheet, this can be improved. From:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 24px; ... } 

to:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: "Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 28px; ... } 

Is this something that others are similarly exercised about? Could it be considered for a change?

Other example questions where this has an impact (mentioned in chat):

UPDATE

Updated to highlight a couple of particularly egregious examples:

A shocker...

another more recent example of fail

Currently, the font specification calls Georgia as the primary serif font for question titles. While undeniably an attractive font, its zero renders almost exactly the same as a lower case letter 'o'. This introduces a significant level of ambiguity:

Georgia rendering a zero

While I think it extremely unlikely that there is a serif font that is readily available on most Unix user's machines that would have a slashed or dotted zero (the ideal), with only a small tweak to the CSS, it would be possible to improve the rendering of zeros for most users:

Times as the default

I'm reluctant to suggest a significant change as I think the overall look of the site is extremely professional - however, for a site for coders and geeks, having ambiguous zeros is rather unfortunate1.

With only a small change to the stylesheet, this can be improved. From:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 24px; ... } 

to:

#question-header .question-hyperlink { color: #155078; font-family: "Times New Roman",Times,serif; font-size: 28px; ... } 

Is this something that others are similarly exercised about? Could it be considered for a change?

Other example questions where this has an impact (mentioned in chat):

UPDATE

Updated to highlight a couple of particularly egregious examples:

A shocker...

another more recent example of fail

edited tags
Link
added anothe example
Source Link
jasonwryan
  • 74.9k
  • 32
  • 57
Loading
newer example
Source Link
jasonwryan
  • 74.9k
  • 32
  • 57
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/102358754959429632
added 76 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Caleb
  • 72k
  • 19
  • 25
Loading
Source Link
jasonwryan
  • 74.9k
  • 32
  • 57
Loading