Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack OverflowStack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange siteCode Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

Do we want code or design reviews on this site?

Code reviews expect considerable effort on the part of readers, more than a typical question. Furthermore, they are very open-ended — “I can't see anything wrong with this code” is a valid, but not that interesting answer (and what about “I can't see anything wrong either”, which is a different answer for every “I”?). Design reviews require less reading effort, but suffer from the same problem with answers.

This has been discussed about Stack Overflow before. The discussions I could find are:

There is now a Code Review Stack Exchange site, but this should not influence our stance of what's acceptable on this site too much.

This meta question was triggered by What else could I lock down for buildbot runs?.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Loading
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading