Timeline for how to pipe find's output into another find
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/ | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 0:11 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 22:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/403281988901437440 | ||
| Nov 20, 2013 at 21:53 | vote | accept | Marcus Junius Brutus | ||
| Nov 20, 2013 at 21:24 | answer | added | Adaephon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 21:04 | answer | added | Rmano | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 20:09 | comment | added | enzotib | I think it is not possible in this form, because the only way the second command in the pipe can sort the resulting lines is based on the content it get, so the find should be modified to provide the timestamps. Unless you think that the showLatest should reconstruct the timestamps from filenames, that is very ugly and time comsuming. | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 18:57 | history | asked | Marcus Junius Brutus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |