Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

1
  • 1
    If there were a "most effective" archive format there wouldn't be 50 of them in common use. Your question doesn't really contain enough detail to answer. Also the first idea in my head is that if you have data that you need to look at frequently and edit periodically it probably shouldn't be in archives in the first place. They are, after all, archives. Commented Aug 7, 2011 at 7:32