Timeline for sorting using the -k command
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:40 | comment | added | Stéphane Chazelas | Or just sort -t / -k 2 or sort -k 3.7 | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:30 | history | edited | Jeff Schaller♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 83 characters in body; edited tags |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:29 | answer | added | Jeff Schaller♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:28 | comment | added | ott-- | So with sort -t / -k 2,3 it should be working. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:26 | comment | added | jimmij | Give larger input sample, and expected output. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:23 | comment | added | Jakuje | you should check out -t switch to define field separator. Also providing some test case where the sort would be noticeable would be nice. | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:19 | |||||
| Jan 7, 2016 at 16:13 | history | asked | A.Rae | CC BY-SA 3.0 |