Timeline for quickly change the next several lines in vim?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 8, 2016 at 18:43 | history | suggested | user147505 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | readability |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 18:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 8, 2016 at 18:43 | |||||
| Sep 8, 2016 at 18:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 8, 2016 at 18:35 | |||||
| S Sep 8, 2016 at 5:16 | history | suggested | Lieven Keersmaekers | CC BY-SA 3.0 | The last match doens't need replacing as per OP's question. |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 5:15 | comment | added | Anthon | We have edit history, tagging on "Edit" with some extra information makes your post less readable. Think about all future readers, you should integrate your changes to make your answer a consistent whole that is easy to read and understand. Tagging on your thoughts this way doesn't achieve that. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 5:13 | comment | added | Miati | I do this when it's quick to type but try replacing (for example) database passwords that can look like this -> ]Xqysmw#IUeO"g@bp9y}BCj<-@|?X.3 The point is the content of the words shouldn't suddenly make copying with the mouse faster. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 4:56 | comment | added | Lieven Keersmaekers | This is how I would go about it to. Not to much thinking required. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 4:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 8, 2016 at 5:16 | |||||
| Sep 8, 2016 at 3:37 | history | answered | Matt Obert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |