Timeline for Is /sys content obsolete in Linux?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 24, 2016 at 2:35 | history | suggested | 3kstc | CC BY-SA 3.0 | capitalisation |
| Oct 24, 2016 at 2:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 24, 2016 at 2:35 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2016 at 0:16 | comment | added | Bratchley | The difference is that the /proc hardware data/files are older. | |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:54 | history | edited | Junaga | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 218 characters in body; edited title |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:35 | vote | accept | Junaga | ||
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:24 | answer | added | jlliagre | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:13 | comment | added | Junaga | So the only difference between the hardware info provided by both of them is the sorting and displaying? | |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:11 | comment | added | Bratchley | In general /proc is for higher level kernel/process stuff whereas /sys is for hardware behavior. The hardware entries underneath /proc are usually older entries that pre-date /sys | |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 23:10 | history | edited | Junaga | CC BY-SA 3.0 | removed off topic |
| Oct 23, 2016 at 22:52 | history | asked | Junaga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |