Timeline for Why can I run `sudo bash` but not `sudo su`?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2017 at 22:08 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 18 characters in body; edited tags; edited title |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 12:19 | answer | added | Kusalananda♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 12:06 | comment | added | Jeff Schaller♦ | unix.stackexchange.com/q/8581/117549 | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:53 | comment | added | Ram Kumar | And what's the recommended way to give full root access to sysadmins? (or if you want to say less harmful and audited way) | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:51 | comment | added | Ram Kumar | Ah right.. there are certain files in /etc/sudoers.d and that's how 'sudo bash' was working but i thought it was commented out... Thanks. #includedir /etc/sudoers.d From the sudoers man page: | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:50 | comment | added | Kusalananda♦ | Are there any other configs included at the end of the sudoers file? | |
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:50 | |||||
| Aug 25, 2017 at 11:40 | history | asked | Ram Kumar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |