Skip to main content
edited title
Link

Interesting SCPSecure Copy Behavior

added 106 characters in body
Source Link

I'm not entirely sure where to ask this question, so if this is not the right place just let me know and I'll move it.

Today I was trying to using recursive scp to copy a directory between two Linux servers and made a typo when referring to the destination server. Instead of transferring the directory to the other machine, it began to transfer the file back into itself. It took a while for me to notice what it was doing since the directory was so large, but then I started seeing the same files popping up again and again on the transfer status until I killed it. It confused me that this was allowed and I have a few questions.

I guess my main question I would like to ask you all, though, is if there is ever an instance when a user would need to make a secure copy to himself on the same machine or is it an unnecessary side effect of scp that was just shrugged off?

Edit - Sorry guys, here's the actual command

scp -r /path/to/dir SameUser@sameserver:/path/to/dir

I'm not entirely sure where to ask this question, so if this is not the right place just let me know and I'll move it.

Today I was trying to using recursive scp to copy a directory between two Linux servers and made a typo when referring to the destination server. Instead of transferring the directory to the other machine, it began to transfer the file back into itself. It took a while for me to notice what it was doing since the directory was so large, but then I started seeing the same files popping up again and again on the transfer status until I killed it. It confused me that this was allowed and I have a few questions.

I guess my main question I would like to ask you all, though, is if there is ever an instance when a user would need to make a secure copy to himself on the same machine or is it an unnecessary side effect of scp that was just shrugged off?

I'm not entirely sure where to ask this question, so if this is not the right place just let me know and I'll move it.

Today I was trying to using recursive scp to copy a directory between two Linux servers and made a typo when referring to the destination server. Instead of transferring the directory to the other machine, it began to transfer the file back into itself. It took a while for me to notice what it was doing since the directory was so large, but then I started seeing the same files popping up again and again on the transfer status until I killed it. It confused me that this was allowed and I have a few questions.

I guess my main question I would like to ask you all, though, is if there is ever an instance when a user would need to make a secure copy to himself on the same machine or is it an unnecessary side effect of scp that was just shrugged off?

Edit - Sorry guys, here's the actual command

scp -r /path/to/dir SameUser@sameserver:/path/to/dir

Source Link

Interesting SCP Behavior

I'm not entirely sure where to ask this question, so if this is not the right place just let me know and I'll move it.

Today I was trying to using recursive scp to copy a directory between two Linux servers and made a typo when referring to the destination server. Instead of transferring the directory to the other machine, it began to transfer the file back into itself. It took a while for me to notice what it was doing since the directory was so large, but then I started seeing the same files popping up again and again on the transfer status until I killed it. It confused me that this was allowed and I have a few questions.

I guess my main question I would like to ask you all, though, is if there is ever an instance when a user would need to make a secure copy to himself on the same machine or is it an unnecessary side effect of scp that was just shrugged off?