Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 1
    Possible, but not advisable... Commented Sep 26, 2018 at 11:53
  • 1
    Raid 0 on ordinary disks is only advisable when you either have good backups or don't care about losing all your data. (I've seen raid 0 on top of multiple small raid 5 arrays, and it was only done because the users couldn't afford a proper large array). It sounds like you care about losing data; do you have backups? Commented Sep 26, 2018 at 12:04
  • Even if we have single disk, data loss is there...so what is the difference having a single disk or having raid-0 with 2 disks...? Commented Sep 26, 2018 at 12:09
  • 2
    With 2 disks in raid 0, you get twice the chance of data loss! Commented Sep 26, 2018 at 12:16
  • I am using just for testing to increase performance...How much probability can i expect of data loss (ie: 50%)and i which cases it to happen.. Commented Sep 26, 2018 at 12:23