Timeline for How to prevent `atime` in Linux from overwriting `Date created` in Windows on NTFS?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2019 at 15:30 | history | edited | The Quark | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 242 characters in body |
| May 18, 2019 at 17:07 | history | edited | The Quark | CC BY-SA 4.0 | edited title |
| May 18, 2019 at 17:03 | comment | added | The Quark | @JdeBP: I see your point now. Thanks. I have rephrased the question. | |
| May 18, 2019 at 16:59 | history | edited | The Quark | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 128 characters in body |
| May 18, 2019 at 11:54 | comment | added | JdeBP | You quite clearly have not read all of those, otherwise your question would not have the first sentence and third paragraph that it currently has. | |
| May 18, 2019 at 6:45 | comment | added | The Quark | @JdeBP: I had already read all those Q&As. My question is not 'how to make Linux support creation times', it is 'how to make it not use the creation time placeholder of NTFS to put atime values. | |
| May 18, 2019 at 0:22 | comment | added | JdeBP | It's often a good idea to read existing Q&As before asking a question. superuser.com/a/703927/38062 unix.stackexchange.com/a/407305/5132 unix.stackexchange.com/q/7562/5132 unix.stackexchange.com/q/24441/5132 | |
| May 17, 2019 at 19:00 | answer | added | Luciano Andress Martini | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 17, 2019 at 18:20 | comment | added | mdpc | I think that you are talking about a serious inode change to make this happen. | |
| May 17, 2019 at 17:54 | comment | added | 炸鱼薯条德里克 | But is it true that Linux really don't support creation time? | |
| May 17, 2019 at 17:41 | history | asked | The Quark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |