Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • xterm-256color is not universally applicable, and often an incorrect choice, of course. unix.stackexchange.com/a/560992/5132 Commented Jan 9, 2020 at 20:58
  • Of course, and putty is just one other implementation... I don't use putty. On my desk, I could use gnome-terminal, mate-terminal, konsole and xterm (my favorite) who all recognize xterm-256color. Commented Jan 9, 2020 at 21:17
  • No. They are not involved in any form of "recognition", and using xterm-256color for them is an incorrect choice, too. GNOME Terminal's correct terminal type is either gnome-256color or vte-256colour, for example. unix.stackexchange.com/a/515517/5132 Commented Jan 9, 2020 at 21:35
  • In addition to all of this, I've created a little bash library hsvrgb.sh, with a hsvrgb browser and a hsvrgb demo. Commented Sep 14, 2021 at 7:24
  • BTW modern distribution include proper terminal definitions for putty: find /usr/share/terminfo/ -name '*putty*' | wc -l reports 21 on my system. And PuTTY itself sends its identity as xterm for wider compatibility, but can it send anything more appropriate if you change the default in Connection - Terminal-type string. putty-256color is a good start. Commented Nov 14, 2021 at 14:15