Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Is this the only backup of those files? If it is, I'd strongly recommend doing incremental backups instead of just rsync, otherwise you may not be able to recover all the information you need. Commented Jul 14, 2013 at 22:49
  • @Paulo Almeida, why is that, if it creates a mirror? Is this not roughly the Linux equivalent of robocopy? Commented Jul 15, 2013 at 11:35
  • If a file gets corrupted, or you accidentally overwrite it, and you only notice it after the rsync runs, now both the original and the backup are corrupted. Keeping history is one of the principles of good backup practice. Of course, as in everything related to backups, there's a balance depending on how important the data are to you. But for instance, slm recommended Backuppc, which keeps history without using too much space, by using hard links. Commented Jul 15, 2013 at 12:11