Timeline for Negatives/downsides of Ubuntu's no-root sudo setup
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2011 at 11:12 | answer | added | Sirex | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 9, 2011 at 9:44 | answer | added | Keith Thompson | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 21, 2011 at 13:29 | comment | added | mattdm | Well, FWIW, I've been pushing for Fedora to do this since, well, since before Ubuntu existed, and I believe it'll finally be the default in F16 if not F15. | |
| Mar 21, 2011 at 0:02 | answer | added | Arrowmaster | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 21:30 | comment | added | J. Taylor | No I hadn't seen that. Thanks for pointing it out. It pretty much answers most of my questions about the pros/cons of using sudo ... although I'd still be interested in understanding the motives of other distros for not doing things the Ubuntu way. | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 21:20 | answer | added | J. Taylor | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 21:12 | answer | added | polemon | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 21:05 | answer | added | D4RIO | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 20:19 | comment | added | mattdm | Have you seen unix.stackexchange.com/questions/8581/… ? | |
| Mar 20, 2011 at 20:16 | history | asked | J. Taylor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |