Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • Can you give an example of a site where the right duration has been achieved? It would be interesting to compare the case where it was done right and where it was not. I generally like the idea of hiding the header very much, but I might be biased because when I see one, I appriciate that the designer has thought of it more than thinking if it is distracting, too fast or to slow. Commented Aug 2, 2023 at 18:52
  • 1
    To be honest, I consider this an outdated UX pattern, partly because there isn't a "correct" duration that all users will be satisfied with, and partly because it's distracting even when it works. I avoid sticky headers entirely on mobile, and mostly do the same on desktop; the pattern Stack Overflow currently follows (where most of the header scrolls as part of the normal page body, but a reduced header is permanently sticky) is also a reasonable one -- if there is a compelling reason that the contents of the sticky part need to be always available. Commented Aug 2, 2023 at 21:45