Skip to main content
Web Applications

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • A vote up for multiple contexts this answer gives, yet the direction of thoughts is arguable. My intuition tells that undesired local results are not there because Google wants to show them or specifically have indirect profits, but because local community have higher area-specific ratio of SEO exploit efforts over Google protection mechanisms. In this case, blaming Google misses the point. However, lack of default no history collection mode in Chrome sounds like an argument against my intuition and for this answer. Commented Nov 4, 2023 at 17:52
  • @halt9k Thanks for your reply. I don't claim that this answer is perfect. It fails to add the references I mentioned in my comments posted to the question, among other things. I can't promise that I will refine this particular answer, but I will be around Commented Nov 4, 2023 at 20:15
  • @Rubén-VolunteerModerator- I believe long speech "If you don't want to get customized results, stop using Google and look for search engines..." could be shortcut to GTFO-alike word. Seriously speaking, we have Google quasi-monopoly and until economic means to thwart FAANG monsters like AT&T monopoly in 1985, this conversation about 'find other search engine' begs for 'so lets split Google capital and use parts of it for other purposes, yes we don't care about private property'. Do you see where I point? Commented May 22, 2024 at 18:29
  • Please feel free to post your own answer. Commented May 22, 2024 at 18:35