Timeline for Can I use Google+ for image hosting on forum sites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2016 at 14:28 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 6, 2016 at 1:53 | answer | added | Edward Green | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 13:54 | comment | added | mikato | It is possible to do this with Flickr, but it's against their rules unless you include the link back to the Flickr photo page. I'd like to know if the same is true for the new Google Photos... maybe I'll post a new question. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 14:19 | vote | accept | bgmCoder | ||
| Aug 24, 2014 at 18:15 | answer | added | abraham | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 24, 2014 at 16:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWebApps/status/503584178873847809 | ||
| Aug 24, 2014 at 16:02 | answer | added | Nima | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 24, 2014 at 7:44 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 13 characters in body; edited title |
| Aug 24, 2014 at 3:16 | comment | added | bgmCoder | I just don't want a bunch of social-media mumbo-jumbo to go along with it. Flikr works fine if you don't mind the mumbo-jumbo, but I was considering google+ since I already have it and don't use it for anything. Imgur has all kinds of images that I don't want to be associated with. The trick would be getting that bb-link... | |
| Aug 24, 2014 at 3:13 | comment | added | Huey | use imgur? google+ should work, though you might have to set the privacy settings to public. It's actually a good idea I think, since google+ gives you unlimited storage space for photos below a certain resolution. | |
| Aug 24, 2014 at 2:49 | history | asked | bgmCoder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |