Timeline for Are CloudFlare or Google Analytics visitor numbers more appropriate to report to advertisers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ with https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 17:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://www.searchenginepeople.com/ with https://www.searchenginepeople.com/ | |
| Feb 4, 2017 at 12:53 | comment | added | David 天宇 Wong | hotlinked images probably triggers a hit on Cloudflare whereas they should not. So I agree that Google Analytics should be more accurate. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 17:04 | comment | added | closetnoc | I agree that disabling JavaScript has probably dropped significantly, however, there is still a segment that deals with security issues that by routine disables JavaScript. I use this example as a hint. There are user segments that disable JavaScript routinely- i.e. highly technically aware people. I read a factoid last year the ascribed as much as %40 of such user segments disabled JavaScript. This was a reputable source. I did not fully believe this of course! It is just something to be aware of and may apply more strongly to some sites and not at all to others. Just a thought. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 16:42 | vote | accept | pee2pee | ||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 13:17 | history | answered | Stephen Ostermiller♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |