686

I'm trying to work out how to cast an Int into a String in Swift.

I figure out a workaround, using NSNumber but I'd love to figure out how to do it all in Swift.

let x : Int = 45 let xNSNumber = x as NSNumber let xString : String = xNSNumber.stringValue 

23 Answers 23

1144

Converting Int to String:

let x : Int = 42 var myString = String(x) 

And the other way around - converting String to Int:

let myString : String = "42" let x: Int? = myString.toInt() if (x != nil) { // Successfully converted String to Int } 

Or if you're using Swift 2 or 3:

let x: Int? = Int(myString) 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

While this works, use the toString function, shown in an answer below.
Int doesn't appear to have a toString() method at least not in Xcode 6.2 edit: I see that there is a global toString method (not Int.toString()), anyone know the advantage over using the String() constructor?
Note that String(Int?) writes "Optional(Int)", at least in Swift 2, that could not be what you meant. Use instead Int?.description
Wonderful, but doesn't work for me. I have an optional Int, and String(myInt) wont compile - it claims "Int? cannot be converted to String". There are no toString() or toInt() methods available for me either, or stringValue and intValue not there. Even a String(myInt!) will tell me that the initializer has been renamed to something like String(describing: myInt!).
For Swift 4, see Hamed Gh's answer below. The correct usage is String(describing: x)
100

Check the Below Answer:

let x : Int = 45 var stringValue = "\(x)" print(stringValue) 

7 Comments

meh, this is an ugly and unnecessary workaround when String already has a constructor accepting Int
what wrong you find this? why you put down vote? @GabrielePetronella
I don't think this is particularly ugly, except that some parsing tools may not handle string interpolation nicely. Otherwise, who knows -- it might faster. Using ""+x in Javascript is generally faster than using a String constructor, for example. This example is only a couple of characters shorter, but I would certainly prefer string interpolation in cases where you were constructing a sentence from several variables.
I wouldn't downvote this answer just because its ugly but as @GabrielePetronella said, there's no need to use string interpolation when String has a constructor that accepts an Int. Its much more clear and concise.
How is this uglier than array literals?
|
72

Here are 4 methods:

var x = 34 var s = String(x) var ss = "\(x)" var sss = toString(x) var ssss = x.description 

I can imagine that some people will have an issue with ss. But if you were looking to build a string containing other content then why not.

5 Comments

I just watch some of the Stanford U new course on Swift and iOS 8. Your var ss = "\(x)" example is exactly how they advised converting a double to a string. Which I thought was easy and great.
And thinking more about sass - that's really bad.
toString has been renamed to String
s is now (Swift 3.1) String(describing: x) the older syntax yields compiler error.
@MottiShneor No, this is wrong. String(describing:) should never be used for anything else than debugging. It is not the normal String initializer.
55

In Swift 3.0:

var value: Int = 10 var string = String(describing: value) 

3 Comments

This is wrong. String(describing:) should never be used for anything else than debugging. It is not the normal String initializer.
Is this still wrong in Swift 5? @ayaio, cause basing from documentation it doesn't seem wrong
I would imagine so? it shouldn't be used for banch of different reasons, though, like for veing much too powerful for task on hands
33

Swift 4:

let x:Int = 45 let str:String = String(describing: x) 

Developer.Apple.com > String > init(describing:)

The String(describing:) initializer is the preferred way to convert an instance of any type to a string.

Custom String Convertible

enter image description here

9 Comments

result Optional(1)
This is wrong. String(describing:) should never be used for anything else than debugging. It is not the normal String initializer.
Hamed Gh, Morithz already provide right answer in same question check my answer Just use the normal String() initializer. But don't give it an optional, unwrap first. Or, like in your example, use ??. Like this: let str = String(x ?? 0)
@HamedGh Look at the examples in the link you give yourself. The describing method is here to... describe its content. It gives a description. Sometimes it's the same as the conversion, sometimes not. Give an optional to describing and you'll see the result... It will not be a conversion. There's a simple, dedicated way to convert: using the normal String initializer, as explained in other answers. Read the complete page that you link to: see that this method searches for descriptions using different ways, some of which would give wrong results if you expect accurate conversion..
You really should remove the describing part of this answer. Conversion should be done without using any parameter name in the String constructor.
|
31

Just for completeness, you can also use:

let x = 10.description 

or any other value that supports a description.

1 Comment

This worked for me when trying to show the value in a label. With the other approaches it was always Optional(0) instead of 0. Thank you
12

Swift 4:

Trying to show the value in label without Optional() word.

here x is a Int value using.

let str:String = String(x ?? 0) 

5 Comments

No. String(describing:) should never be used for anything else than debugging. It is not the normal String initializer.
Hello @Moritz so what can i do for remove optional word ? i have a Int value and than i want to print in label
Just use the normal String() initializer. But don't give it an optional, unwrap first. Or, like in your example, use ??. Like this: let str = String(x ?? 0)
developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/string/2427941-init i understand your point what is the use of describing
It's mostly for debugging purposes. You can describe the name of classes, get the description of instances, etc. But it should never be used for strings that are used in the app itself.
10

To save yourself time and hassle in the future you can make an Int extension. Typically I create a shared code file where I put extensions, enums, and other fun stuff. Here is what the extension code looks like:

extension Int { func toString() -> String { var myString = String(self) return myString } } 

Then later when you want to convert an int to a string you can just do something like:

var myNumber = 0 var myNumberAsString = myNumber.toString() 

2 Comments

Potentially stupid question, but should this be a function, or a computed variable? I can't recall which one Swift normally uses in these cases - is it toInt or toInt().
To save yourself some time and hassle just use myNumber.description. No need for any extensions.
10

in swift 3.0 this is how we can convert Int to String and String to Int

//convert Integer to String in Swift 3.0 let theIntegerValue :Int = 123 // this can be var also let theStringValue :String = String(theIntegerValue) //convert String to Integere in Swift 3.0 let stringValue : String = "123" let integerValue : Int = Int(stringValue)! 

3 Comments

In the last line of the code, why do we need an exclamation mark at the end?
@OmarTariq, because we explicitly tells the compiler that the integerValue's type is Int. then cannot have a nil value for it. so compiler tells you to unwrap it. if you want to avoid this , use it like let integerValue = Int(stringValue). then you won't get a problem. sorry for the late reply.
@OmarTariq Unwrapping in this case can be really bad. If the string isn't a number this will crash your application. You should really check to ensure that is valid and not force unwrap it.
10

Swift String performance

A little bit about performance UI Testing Bundle on iPhone 7(real device) with iOS 14

let i = 0 lt result1 = String(i) //0.56s 5890kB lt result2 = "\(i)" //0.624s 5900kB lt result3 = i.description //0.758s 5890kB 
import XCTest class ConvertIntToStringTests: XCTestCase { let count = 1_000_000 func measureFunction(_ block: () -> Void) { let metrics: [XCTMetric] = [ XCTClockMetric(), XCTMemoryMetric() ] let measureOptions = XCTMeasureOptions.default measureOptions.iterationCount = 5 measure(metrics: metrics, options: measureOptions) { block() } } func testIntToStringConstructor() { var result = "" measureFunction { for i in 0...count { result += String(i) } } } func testIntToStringInterpolation() { var result = "" measureFunction { for i in 0...count { result += "\(i)" } } } func testIntToStringDescription() { var result = "" measureFunction { for i in 0...count { result += i.description } } } } 

Comments

8

for whatever reason the accepted answer did not work for me. I went with this approach:

var myInt:Int = 10 var myString:String = toString(myInt) 

Comments

8
let intAsString = 45.description // "45" let stringAsInt = Int("45") // 45 

Comments

6

Multiple ways to do this :

var str1:String="\(23)" var str2:String=String(format:"%d",234) 

Comments

5

Swift 2:

var num1 = 4 var numString = "56" var sum2 = String(num1) + numString var sum3 = Int(numString) 

Comments

3

iam using this simple approach

String to Int:

 var a = Int() var string1 = String("1") a = string1.toInt() 

and from Int to String:

var a = Int() a = 1 var string1 = String() string1= "\(a)" 

Comments

3

Convert Unicode Int to String

For those who want to convert an Int to a Unicode string, you can do the following:

let myInteger: Int = 97 // convert Int to a valid UnicodeScalar guard let myUnicodeScalar = UnicodeScalar(myInteger) else { return "" } // convert UnicodeScalar to String let myString = String(myUnicodeScalar) // results print(myString) // a 

Or alternatively:

let myInteger: Int = 97 if let myUnicodeScalar = UnicodeScalar(myInteger) { let myString = String(myUnicodeScalar) } 

1 Comment

@jvarela, This does still work. I just retested it in Xcode 8.2 (Swift 3.0.2). The String initializer can take a UnicodeScalar.
3

I prefer using String Interpolation

let x = 45 let string = "\(x)" 

Each object has some string representation. This makes things simpler. For example if you need to create some String with multiple values. You can also do any math in it or use some conditions

let text = "\(count) \(count > 1 ? "items" : "item") in the cart. Sum: $\(sum + shippingPrice)" 

Comments

2

exampleLabel.text = String(yourInt)

Comments

2

If you like swift extension, you can add following code

extension Int { var string:String { get { return String(self) } } } 

then, you can get string by the method you just added

var x = 1234 var s = x.string 

Comments

1

To convert String into Int

var numberA = Int("10") Print(numberA) // It will print 10 

To covert Int into String

var numberA = 10 

1st way)

print("numberA is \(numberA)") // It will print 10 

2nd way)

var strSomeNumber = String(numberA) 

or

var strSomeNumber = "\(numberA)" 

Comments

1
let a =123456888 var str = String(a) 

OR

var str = a as! String 

Comments

1

In swift 3.0, you may change integer to string as given below

let a:String = String(stringInterpolationSegment: 15) 

Another way is

let number: Int = 15 let _numberInStringFormate: String = String(number) 

//or any integer number in place of 15

1 Comment

From API reference "Do not call this initializer directly. It is used by the compiler when interpreting string interpolations." May be you want to double check if you are using it somewhere.
0
let Str = "12" let num: Int = 0 num = Int (str) 

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.