70

In Python, if I do this:

print "4" * 4

I get

> "4444"

In Perl, I'd get

> 16

Is there an easy way to do the former in Perl?

Improve this question
1
  • This is also possible with string variables (and string expressions), see my answer. Commented May 7, 2015 at 12:20

7 Answers 7

Reset to default
116 
$ perl -e 'print "4" x 4; print "\n"' 4444

The x operator is documented in perldoc perlop. Here binary means an operator taking two arguments, not composed of bits, by the way.

Binary "x" is the repetition operator. In scalar context or if the left operand is not enclosed in parentheses, it returns a string consisting of the left operand repeated the number of times specified by the right operand. In list context, if the left operand is enclosed in parentheses or is a list formed by "qw/STRING/", it repeats the list. If the right operand is zero or negative, it returns an empty string or an empty list, depending on the context.

 print '-' x 80; # Print row of dashes print "\t" x ($tab/8), ' ' x ($tab%8); # Tab over @ones = (1) x 80; # A list of 80 1’s @ones = (5) x @ones; # Set all elements to 5

perl -e is meant to execute Perl code from the command line:

 $ perl --help Usage: perl [switches] [--] [programfile] [arguments] -e program one line of program (several -e's allowed, omit programfile)
Improve this answer
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

Just a remark - it may not be clear to all perl users (especially the new ones) what the -e option does, so it would be better to provide direct code example (as Paul's response does).
perl -Esay+4x4 Here, '-E' enables 'use 5.010' (particularly - the 'say' feature). say "$var" is the same as print "$var\n". In scalar context the 'x' operator always returns a string, so there is no need to use quotes here.
Now that would be confusing :-)
And no reason to use double quotes, to pile on the picky.
I have a reason to use quotes, readability and intent. The fact you can omit them doesn't mean you have to (or even should).
|
48

In Perl, you want to use the "x" operator.

Note the difference between

"4" x 4

and

("4") x 4

The former produces a repeated string:

"4444"

the latter a repeated list:

("4", "4", "4", "4")
Improve this answer

2 Comments

In Perl 6 the x operator always returns string (left operand is evaluated in a string context e.g., 4x4 -> "4"x4 -> "4444"), xx - a repeat op for lists e.g., 4xx4 -> (4)xx4 -> (4,4,4,4).
I cannot confirm that for Perl v5.32
18

It's very similar in Perl

print "4" x 4;
Improve this answer

Comments

12

FWIW, it’s also print 4 x 4 in Perl.

In general, in Perl, operators are monomorphic, ie. you have different sets of operators for string semantics, for numeric semantics, for bitwise semantics, etc., where it makes sense, and the type of the operands largely doesn’t matter. When you apply a numeric operator to a string, the string is converted to a number first and you get the operation you asked for (eg. multiplication), and when you apply a string operator to a number, it’s turned into a string and you get the operation you asked for (eg. repetition). Perl pays attention to the operator first and the types of the operands only second – if indeed it pays them any mind at all.

This is the opposite of Python and most other languages, where you use one set of operators, and the types of the operands determine which semantics you’ll actually get – ie. operators are polymorphic.

Improve this answer

3 Comments

The fact you can doesn't mean you should, necessarily. I think that making intentions clear makes the code more readable for everybody. Omitting quotes makes it less readable to my eyes.
a) Did you see anything in my answer about what you should or should not do? (This 4 x 4 is unlikely to show up in real Perl code verbatim anyway.) b) If it is less readable to you, you are paying attention to the wrong things (the forms of the operands, rather than the operator).
a) Did you see anything in my comment about whether you said what one should or should not do? b) When you deal with many languages on almost a daily basis, every little bit helps. Using quotes is totally clear an unambiguous in (almost) any language, omitting them means one extra mental step to take.
2

If you want to print 10 character "A"s, you can also do this

perl -e 'print "A" x 10'; echo

Example with output

user@linux:~$ perl -e 'print "A" x 10'; echo AAAAAAAAAA user@linux:~$
Improve this answer

1 Comment

How is this different from the previous answers?
2

All answers, given so far, missed mentioning that the operator x does not only work on string literals, but also on variables that are strings or expressions that evaluate to strings like

use feature 'say'; my $msg = "hello "; say $msg x 2; say chr(33) x 3;

like this

hello hello !!!

and, even more important, x does an automatic conversion of expressions into strings if they aren't already (thanks to ggorlen for pointing me into that direction!). So for example

say 4 x 2; say [$msg] x 2;

will result in something like the following as output

44 ARRAY(0x30ca10)ARRAY(0x30ca10)
Improve this answer

Comments

-1

you can also read the number from stdin:

$ echo 10 | perl -ane 'print "a" x $F[0]; print "\n"' aaaaaaaaaa
Improve this answer

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.