10

I don't understand why this code is behaving in different way. In the first case, the code will print 'elo' and after 19 seconds we will see '3'.

In other case we will be first wait 19 seconds, and after that we will see 'elo'.

Could you explain me that?

from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor def wait_on_future(): f = 3 import time time.sleep(19) print(f) executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) executor.submit(wait_on_future) print("elo") 

vs

from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor def wait_on_future(): f = 3 import time time.sleep(19) print(f) with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as executor: executor.submit(wait_on_future) print("elo") 

1 Answer 1

22

Your first program does not explicitly close the pool. You submit your task with executor.submit(), which is a non-blocking call. Your main program processes to print statement immediately and just hangs there until all threads have finished after 19 seconds.

Your second program uses with statement, which in this context is blocking. with ThreadPoolExecutor() has an implicit shutdown(wait=True), and it blocks there until all threads have completed processing. See https://docs.python.org/3/library/concurrent.futures.html

This makes your program1 identical in functionality as is your program 2:

executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) executor.submit(wait_on_future) executor.shutdown(wait=True) print("elo") 

Hope this helps.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.